Inspired by experimental observations of Pt(111) surfaces reconstruction at the Pt/graphene (Gr) interfaces with ordered vacancy networks in the outermost Pt layer [e.g., Otero, G., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 216102 ], the mechanism of the surface reconstruction is investigated by van der Waals corrected density functional theory in combination with particle-swarm optimization algorithm and ab initio atomistic thermodynamics. Our global structural search finds a more stable reconstructed structure than that which was reported before. With correction for vacancy formation energy, we demonstrate that the experimental observed surface reconstruction occurred at the earlier stages of graphene formation: (1) reconstruction occurred when C 60 adsorption (before decomposition to form graphene) for C 60 precursor or (2) reconstruction occurred when there were (partial) hydrogens remain in the hydrogenated precursors of C 2 H 4 and planar C 60 H 30 . The reason is attributed to the fact that the energy gain, from the strengthened Pt− C partial sp 3 −like bonding for C of C 60 or for C with partial H (than Pt−Gr bonding), compensates for the energy cost of formation surface vacancies and makes the reconstruction feasible, especially at elevated temperatures. In our predicted reconstructed structure Pt−C covalent bonds are formed that have a great impact on the adsorbed Gr electronic structures.
INTRODUCTIONThe investigations of hybrid organic−metal interfaces are experiencing an explosive growth, 1−4 especially for epitaxial growth of graphene (Gr) layers on metal surfaces. Extraordinary properties such as ambipolar electric field effect, quantization of conductivity, and ultrahigh electron mobility of graphene are demonstrated, 5−7 which can be attributed to the unique electronic structure of graphene and its interaction with metal substrates. One of the practical needs is preparing graphene layers on metal surfaces with different thicknesses. 8,9 Although there are many applications for these systems, mechanisms of graphene−metal bonding at their interfaces in the atomic detail are far from a complete understanding. Different types of interactions coexist at graphene−metal interfaces, which include chemical bonding, van der Waals (vdW) interaction, Pauli repulsion, 10−13 and more often a combination of them. For metal substrates whose lattice constants match that of Gr, strong covalent interactions exist between Gr and metals, and strong interactions usually destroy the Dirac cone of Gr. 14,15 In the cases of Gr physically adsorbed on or ionically bonded with metal surfaces, the Dirac cone is preserved in the band structure, and the energy position of the Dirac cone relative to Fermi energy can be tuned by charge transfer. 16−18 Surface reconstruction at Gr/metal interfaces makes it a challenge to understand the Gr−metal contact mechanism. 19−21 Three questions remain to be answered: how is every atom arranged at the interface, can the reconstructed structure be energetically favored, and whether the metal surf...