2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(02)00539-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen evolution anodes composed of anodically deposited Mn–Mo–Fe oxides for seawater electrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A notable exception is manganese oxide (MnO x ), an OER-active material that has received significant interest in recent years. Initially reported by Bennet, anodes based on MnO x show a strong tendency to selectively evolve oxygen from acidic saline water. Hashimoto et al studied a series of Mn-based mixed metal oxides (MMO) deposited on an IrO x /Ti substrate and showed that such anodes often exhibit nearly 100% selectivity toward OER, under a variety of experimental conditions, for many hours of sustained operation. Besides its high reported OER selectivity, MnO x is also one of the few nonprecious metal-based catalysts that has been reported to be moderately stable in acid under OER conditions . This stability is in strong contrast with other 3d metal oxides such as CoO x and Ni/Fe-based oxyhydroxides, materials that show very high OER activity in alkaline pH, but are unstable and inactive in acid. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception is manganese oxide (MnO x ), an OER-active material that has received significant interest in recent years. Initially reported by Bennet, anodes based on MnO x show a strong tendency to selectively evolve oxygen from acidic saline water. Hashimoto et al studied a series of Mn-based mixed metal oxides (MMO) deposited on an IrO x /Ti substrate and showed that such anodes often exhibit nearly 100% selectivity toward OER, under a variety of experimental conditions, for many hours of sustained operation. Besides its high reported OER selectivity, MnO x is also one of the few nonprecious metal-based catalysts that has been reported to be moderately stable in acid under OER conditions . This stability is in strong contrast with other 3d metal oxides such as CoO x and Ni/Fe-based oxyhydroxides, materials that show very high OER activity in alkaline pH, but are unstable and inactive in acid. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The, they modified manganese-based electrode materials and gained high oxygen efficiencies while testing their catalyst in 0.5 M NaCl at pH 8. However, in later work they focused on selective OER at pH 1, but similarly to Bennett, Hashimoto and co-workers choose comparably low current densities of 1 mA cm –2 . At higher currents of 100 mA cm –2 , El-Monheim tested an electrode made of Mn–Mo–W, which was electrochemically deposited on a Ti/IrO 2 net . Using a two-compartment electrochemical cell equipped with a three-electrode setup, this electrode was analyzed for up to 3500 h in a 0.5 M NaCl solution at pH 8.7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All ∆E i -i plots show straight lines. Thus, we can estimate the resistance difference of two oxide anodes from ∂(∆E i )/∂i = r-r 30 min (11) All potential differences, ∂(∆E i )/∂i, are positive. The activity is determined by the composition of the top-most surface, and the compositions of the top-most surfaces of the three deposits formed by deposition for final 30 min from the fresh solution are not different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of Mo 6+ [4,6] and/or W 6+ [7] was effective, showing the 100 % oxygen evolution efficiency. Formation of triple oxides, such as Mn-Mo-W oxides [8][9][10], Mn-Mo-Fe oxides [11,12] and Mn-Mo-Sn oxides [13,14] were particularly effective for extension of the lifetime of the anode. The electrocatalysts with Mo, W, Fe and/or Sn were all identified as a single phase multiple oxides of γ-MnO 2 structure, without forming any second oxide phase, and were stable without suffering from oxidative dissolution in the form of MnO 4 in spite of the polarization potential far higher than the oxidation potential of MnO 2 to MnO 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%