2020
DOI: 10.1115/1.4048772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen Crossover in Solid–Solid Heat Exchangers for Solar Water and Carbon Dioxide Splitting: A Thermodynamic Analysis

Abstract: In solar thermochemical redox cycles for H2O/CO2-splitting, a large portion of the overall energy demand of the system is associated with heating the redox material from the oxidation temperature to the reduction temperature. Hence, an important measure to improve the efficiency is recuperation of sensible heat stored in the redox material. A solid-solid heat exchanger can be subject to undesirable oxygen crossover, which decreases the oxygen uptake capacity of the redox material and consequently the system ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 258 Solid–solid heat exchanger 1773.15K 1073.15K 10 −3 bar / / / / / Holzemer-Zerhusen et al. 259 Reactor train system for heat recovery 1773K 1073K 10Pa Ceria porous brick / Radiation ∼80% ∼30% Patankar et al. 251 Counter-rotating inert solid heat exchanger / / / Ceria porous medium Inert material cylinder solid Radiation >50% / Lapp et al.…”
Section: Limiting Factors and Heat Recovery Concepts For Solar Conver...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 258 Solid–solid heat exchanger 1773.15K 1073.15K 10 −3 bar / / / / / Holzemer-Zerhusen et al. 259 Reactor train system for heat recovery 1773K 1073K 10Pa Ceria porous brick / Radiation ∼80% ∼30% Patankar et al. 251 Counter-rotating inert solid heat exchanger / / / Ceria porous medium Inert material cylinder solid Radiation >50% / Lapp et al.…”
Section: Limiting Factors and Heat Recovery Concepts For Solar Conver...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No limitation of number nor size of heat exchangers is set and therefore, the suggested solution is the most energetically efficient. Finally, solid-solid heat exchangers between reduced and oxidized ceria were assumed to have an efficiency of 50%, even though this equipment is still under development [55]. In Figure 4, the solid-solid heat exchangers are depicted with units E-102 and E-202.…”
Section: Heat Integration and Waste Heat Exploitationmentioning
confidence: 99%