2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00188.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen, animals and oceanic ventilation: an alternative view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
156
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(139 reference statements)
3
156
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, suspension feeders can filter large volumes of water, particularly in more protected systems having longer hydrodynamic resident times, and therefore preventing eutrophication and reducing water turbidity, which makes light available for microphytobenthos [47,49,50]. In fact, the appearance of a suspension-feeder infauna may have been the driving force for a dramatic increase in ocean ventilation [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, suspension feeders can filter large volumes of water, particularly in more protected systems having longer hydrodynamic resident times, and therefore preventing eutrophication and reducing water turbidity, which makes light available for microphytobenthos [47,49,50]. In fact, the appearance of a suspension-feeder infauna may have been the driving force for a dramatic increase in ocean ventilation [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For decades, the consensus view was that oxygen levels of 1-10% of present atmospheric levels (PALs) were required for metazoan life and particularly for collagen biosynthesis. However, recent studies have radically revised this view, indicating that at least at small size, animals could have lived and reproduced at much lower oxygen levels [35][36][37][38]. Discussions about the drivers of this late Neoproterozoic oxygenation event have led many authors to conclude that the biological activity of organisms may have played an important role [18,36,37,39].…”
Section: Environmental Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flying insects should be particularly susceptible to variations in atmospheric pO 2 because their flight musculature has high energy demands (10), particularly during periods of active flight (11, 12). The volume occupied by tracheae, tubes that transport oxygen throughout the body, scales hypermetrically with body volume, imposing further surface area-to-volume constraints on maximum size (13,14).Although these responses underscore the physiological importance of oxygen, developmental plasticity exhibited by different insect groups may not be indicative of evolutionary changes (15), especially in natural settings where other abiotic influences, biotic interactions, and selective pressure from allometric scaling of life-history traits are also important (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For example, temperature can also be an important influence on insect body size via physiological effects on metabolic oxygen demand and ecological effects on food supply, growing season, and foraging time (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these responses underscore the physiological importance of oxygen, developmental plasticity exhibited by different insect groups may not be indicative of evolutionary changes (15), especially in natural settings where other abiotic influences, biotic interactions, and selective pressure from allometric scaling of life-history traits are also important (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For example, temperature can also be an important influence on insect body size via physiological effects on metabolic oxygen demand and ecological effects on food supply, growing season, and foraging time (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%