2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-5362(00)80002-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen and hydrogen isotope geochemistry of thermal springs of the Western Cape, South Africa: Recharge at high altitude?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a known oversimplification (Jasechko, Wassenaar, & Mayer, ), as recharge ratios vary within individual seasons. ()R/Pwinter()R/Psummer values estimated by the approach described above are best interpreted as approximations. It remains challenging to untangle the relevance of seasonally selective recharge from other factors that may also lead to low groundwater δ 18 O values relative to annual precipitation δ 18 O values, including recharge at higher elevations where precipitation δ 18 O values are often lower (e.g., Gallaher, ; Diamond & Harris, ; Weyhenmeyer et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Figure ). Strong δ 18 O P (annual) ‐elevation relationships do not exist in some of the locations where recharge biases have been proposed (e.g., Cunningham et al, ; Winograd et al, ), implying high‐elevation recharge cannot explain the observation of δ G < δ P (annual) in many areas.…”
Section: Seasonal Biases In Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a known oversimplification (Jasechko, Wassenaar, & Mayer, ), as recharge ratios vary within individual seasons. ()R/Pwinter()R/Psummer values estimated by the approach described above are best interpreted as approximations. It remains challenging to untangle the relevance of seasonally selective recharge from other factors that may also lead to low groundwater δ 18 O values relative to annual precipitation δ 18 O values, including recharge at higher elevations where precipitation δ 18 O values are often lower (e.g., Gallaher, ; Diamond & Harris, ; Weyhenmeyer et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Figure ). Strong δ 18 O P (annual) ‐elevation relationships do not exist in some of the locations where recharge biases have been proposed (e.g., Cunningham et al, ; Winograd et al, ), implying high‐elevation recharge cannot explain the observation of δ G < δ P (annual) in many areas.…”
Section: Seasonal Biases In Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study also explored the contribution of rock–fluid interactions on the original hydrochemistry of groundwater in the area. Diamond and Harris () affirmed on the basis of analysis of data of the stable isotopes of hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon that recharge to some thermal springs in the West Cape Province of South Africa may not be of recent meteoric water. In all these cases, natural tracers have proved useful in hydrological studies in the region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable O and H isotopes have been widely used in tracing source of geothermal waters and delineating hydrogeochemical processes occurring in hydrothermal systems (Wilkinson et al 1992;Ghomshei and Clark 1993;Diamond and Harris 2000;Majumdar et al 2005). In the last two decades, strontium isotope analysis has also been widely applied in hydrogeochemical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%