2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidized extracellular DNA as a stress signal that may modify response to anticancer therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scavenging ROS inhibiting bystander effect effectively has been reported in many previous studies [1, 2, 28]. Lower production of ROS after irradiation in mitochondrial DNA lacking ρ 0 cells compared with the normal cells is considered as one main reason by which ρ 0 cells irradiation doesn't induce a bystander effect [79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Scavenging ROS inhibiting bystander effect effectively has been reported in many previous studies [1, 2, 28]. Lower production of ROS after irradiation in mitochondrial DNA lacking ρ 0 cells compared with the normal cells is considered as one main reason by which ρ 0 cells irradiation doesn't induce a bystander effect [79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, ccfDNA in our study was taken not only 1–2 days after the treatment initiation but also more than a month in a treatment. The possible explanation can be then based on the fact that the majority of ccfDNA is of non-cancerous origin and originates from apoptotic and stressed cells [6]. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can stress normal cells and increase non-cancerous ccfDNA release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correct genomic content packaging of a cell committed to die would minimize the spreading of harmful genes, such as oncogenes or viral DNA. In this context, extracellular DNA from dead cells can activate intracellular pathways in living "receptor" cells, leading to disparate consequences that range from cytotoxicity to cellular transformation (46,47). Therefore, knowing how chromatin collapse and nuclear disassembly are regulated during caspase-dependent apoptosis could be instrumental for understanding the intimate mechanism that governs an accurate and silent non-harmful cell death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%