Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxide–Support Interactions

Abstract: The sections in this article are Acknowledgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] Unfortunately, most characterization techniques either give a partial picture of the surface structure, or appear to be silent if the creation of metal-oxygen-support bonds does not significantly perturb the first coordination sphere of the metal. 5 As an example, Raman spectroscopy allows one to differentiate between mono-oxo and di-oxo surface species, 6 and polymeric vs. monomeric species. But this technique is much less convincing when the symmetry is concerned (octahedral vs. tetrahedral) and nearly blind with respect to metaloxygen-support bonds, even in the simplest case, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Unfortunately, most characterization techniques either give a partial picture of the surface structure, or appear to be silent if the creation of metal-oxygen-support bonds does not significantly perturb the first coordination sphere of the metal. 5 As an example, Raman spectroscopy allows one to differentiate between mono-oxo and di-oxo surface species, 6 and polymeric vs. monomeric species. But this technique is much less convincing when the symmetry is concerned (octahedral vs. tetrahedral) and nearly blind with respect to metaloxygen-support bonds, even in the simplest case, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%