2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxide Inhibitor-Assisted Growth of Single-Layer Molybdenum Dichalcogenides (MoX2, X = S, Se, Te) with Controllable Molybdenum Release

Abstract: Though chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods have been widely used in the growth of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides (2D TMDCs), the controllable fabrication of 2D TMDCs is yet hard to achieve because of the great challenge of concisely controlling the release of precursors vapor, one of the most critical growth kinetic factors. To solve this important issue, here we report the utilization of oxide inhibitors covering Mo source during CVD reactions to manipulate the release of Mo vapor. In co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major drawbacks in a conventional MO‐based CVD growth is the presence of excessive nucleation density, which causes the formation of MO entities prior to their sulfurization, [ 19 ] and thus multilayer and other inhomogeneities are obtained. Several approaches were suggested in order to control the metal precursor concentration and to avoid this unwanted outcome, including the use of a separate quartz tubes for the MO and chalcogen precursors, [ 26 ] the use of the so‐called seed promoters, [ 23,27 ] or the use of physical barriers, [ 28–33 ] to diminish the amount of metal precursor on the growth substrate, and thus reducing by that the nucleation density and inhibiting the formation of MO nanostructures prior to their sulfurization. The use of a confined space [ 28–32,34 ] to grow a TMDC layer is a particular case of the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major drawbacks in a conventional MO‐based CVD growth is the presence of excessive nucleation density, which causes the formation of MO entities prior to their sulfurization, [ 19 ] and thus multilayer and other inhomogeneities are obtained. Several approaches were suggested in order to control the metal precursor concentration and to avoid this unwanted outcome, including the use of a separate quartz tubes for the MO and chalcogen precursors, [ 26 ] the use of the so‐called seed promoters, [ 23,27 ] or the use of physical barriers, [ 28–33 ] to diminish the amount of metal precursor on the growth substrate, and thus reducing by that the nucleation density and inhibiting the formation of MO nanostructures prior to their sulfurization. The use of a confined space [ 28–32,34 ] to grow a TMDC layer is a particular case of the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[177] In this regard, CVD provides a controllable and scalable pathway to grow large-size and single-crystalline 2D materials at a reasonable cost. [70,[178][179][180][181][182][183] In the last three years, there have been breakthrough achievements in the CVD growth of 2D UWBG materials. For instance, a pioneering research of growing waferscale single-crystal h-BN film via self-collimated grain formation was reported by Kim's group.…”
Section: Bottom-up Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, we prepared 2D In2Se3 in a confined microreactor made up of two face-to-face stacked mica substrates. 10 Because of the well-controlled precursor concentration, the as-prepared In2Se3 reached a size of over 200 µm. In addition, the development of new growth reactors that moderate the gas flow is a promising way to grow other 2D compounds.…”
Section: Other Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%