2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative stability of n-3-enriched chicken patties under different package-atmosphere conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 5.62 in our chicken samples was lower than in the studies of Živković et al (2017) and Milićević et al (2014). With dietary manipulation, chicken meat enriched with n-3 PUFA with n-6/n-3 <5 can be produced (Penko et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 5.62 in our chicken samples was lower than in the studies of Živković et al (2017) and Milićević et al (2014). With dietary manipulation, chicken meat enriched with n-3 PUFA with n-6/n-3 <5 can be produced (Penko et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Contrasting, CBNC presented similar TBARS values to the antioxidant-treated samples, being 0.69, 1.93, 1.91, 2.91 mgMDA.kg −1 on d 0, 3, 6, and 9, respectively. Indeed, Średnicka-Tober et al (2016) have pointed to higher oxidation in organic broiler meat than in conventional chicken because of higher values of PUFA in organic meat that predispose to lipid oxidation ( Penko et al, 2015 ). Although we did not use organic broiler meat in this study, the antibiotic-free broiler, which has a similar rearing system compared to organic, showed higher PUFA values (19.35%) than conventional (16.45%) meat, explaining the observed lipid oxidation values ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…%, with < 1 % relative accuracy at O 2 concentrations of 10-100 vol. %, at 20 °C (Penko et al, 2015). Water, protein and fat content in the samples were determined using the Food ScanTM Analyser with self-calibration (FOSS, Denmark), pH values were measured directly using a combined glass-gel spear electrode (Type 03, Testo Pty Ltd, Australia), colour L* (lightness), a* (±, red to green) and b* (±, yellow to blue) values on the surface of a 2.54 cm raw slice were measured by CR-400 colorimeter (Konica Minolta Optics, Inc., Osaka, Japan), and instrumental analysis of texture was performed using the TA-XT Plus texture analyser (Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Godalming, Surrey, UK) as described in Zahija et al (2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analyses: Approximately 100 g of a representative sample was homogenised for 20 s with a Grindomix homogeniser (GM 200; Retch, Germany) at 5000-6000 rpm (ISO 3100-1, 1991). The extent of lipid oxidation of the chicken samples was monitored by measuring the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARs) as described by Penko et al (2015). A slightly modified (Rotar, 2019) spectrophotometric method by Soglia et al (2016) was used to determine the protein carbonyl content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%