2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ew00522k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative sorption of arsenite from water by iron: a mechanistic perspective

Abstract: Removal of arsenite by oxidation and sorption via various iron particles (ZVI, bimetallic particles, iron (oxyhydr)oxides, bi- and tri-metal oxides, structural Fe(ii) hydroxides and ferrate), and their respective removal methodologies are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 215 publications
(442 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Therefore, one of the most widely used methods is the in situ formation of highly active iron oxides based on the hydrolysis of iron salts to achieve arsenic adsorption and coagulation. 14,15 Commonly used ferric coagulants include ferric, 16 ferrous, 17 ferrate and polymeric ferric salts. 18 Satisfactory As(V) treatment effects are obtained with most of these iron salt-based coagulation methods, but poor performance has been observed for As(III), with higher migration due to the weaker interaction between As(III) and Fe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Therefore, one of the most widely used methods is the in situ formation of highly active iron oxides based on the hydrolysis of iron salts to achieve arsenic adsorption and coagulation. 14,15 Commonly used ferric coagulants include ferric, 16 ferrous, 17 ferrate and polymeric ferric salts. 18 Satisfactory As(V) treatment effects are obtained with most of these iron salt-based coagulation methods, but poor performance has been observed for As(III), with higher migration due to the weaker interaction between As(III) and Fe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%