1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00766166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative coupling of methane: An inherent limit to selectivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As Labinger pointed out 58) , formation of C3 and higher hydrocarbons was one of the major contributions to the reduced maximum attainable yield and was confirmed with the extended model including propylene, which predicts an additional loss of product yield at high conversions 66) . The depletion of O2 also causes a decrease in the rates of the catalytic pathways (including OH radical formation) and an increase in gas-phase combustion, leading to much lower selectivity.…”
Section: Mechanistic Aspects Of the Ocm Catalystsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As Labinger pointed out 58) , formation of C3 and higher hydrocarbons was one of the major contributions to the reduced maximum attainable yield and was confirmed with the extended model including propylene, which predicts an additional loss of product yield at high conversions 66) . The depletion of O2 also causes a decrease in the rates of the catalytic pathways (including OH radical formation) and an increase in gas-phase combustion, leading to much lower selectivity.…”
Section: Mechanistic Aspects Of the Ocm Catalystsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The kinetic analysis of the experiments that use a Na 2 WO 4 /SiO 2 catalyst is consistent with the quasi‐equilibrated OH radical formation, which preferentially abstracts hydrogen from CH 4 over C 2 H 4 . The OCM reactions at high pressures remain a challenge because the carbon growth reactions are generally second order with respect to the hydrocarbon or relevant radical concentrations (Scheme ) 3g. The formation of higher hydrocarbons, the concentrations of which increase with high CH 4 conversion, leads to reduced C 2 yields because of their high rates of oxidation to CO x 3g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicate that C 2 selectivity (C 2 H 4 þ C 2 H 6 ) decreases with increasing CH 4 conversion resulting in a virtual one pass yield limit between 25 and 30 %. Indeed an inherent yield barrier of about 30 % was predicted by Labinger already in 1988 [60] based on kinetic arguments that radical HÁ abstraction is insensitive to the nature of the hydrocarbon molecule. Hence, not only CH 4 but also the coupling products C 2 H 6 and C 2 H 4 are activated on the catalyst leading to decreasing selectivity at increasing conversion.…”
Section: Ocm With Dioxygenmentioning
confidence: 97%