2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00070.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidant stress suppresses CFTR expression

Abstract: Epithelial mucous membranes are repeatedly exposed to oxidants and xenobiotics. CFTR plays a role in glutathione transepithelial flux and in defining the hydration and viscoelasticity of protective mucus. We therefore hypothesized that CFTR expression and function may be modulated by oxidant stress. A sublethal oxidant stress ( tert-butylhydroquinone, BHQ) in CFTR-expressing epithelial cells (T84) induced a significant increase in cellular glutathione that was associated with an increase in expression of the g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
74
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although further investigations may be needed to clarify this hypothesis, it is likely that under a stress condition in which CRT is up-regulated (25,26), CRT may be expressed at the cell surface and interact with CFTR, which may stimulate the endocytosis of CFTR and direct it to proteasomal degradation. Recently (during the preparation of this manuscript), it was reported that oxidant stress suppresses CFTR expression (44). Therefore, CRT may enhance the degradation of CFTR by oxidant stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although further investigations may be needed to clarify this hypothesis, it is likely that under a stress condition in which CRT is up-regulated (25,26), CRT may be expressed at the cell surface and interact with CFTR, which may stimulate the endocytosis of CFTR and direct it to proteasomal degradation. Recently (during the preparation of this manuscript), it was reported that oxidant stress suppresses CFTR expression (44). Therefore, CRT may enhance the degradation of CFTR by oxidant stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The reducing environment found in healthy lung cells prevents generation of an exaggerated inflammatory response to inhaled stresses. An oxidative environment, however, influences multiple intracellular signaling events, leading to apoptosis, increased synthesis and secretion of mucin [21], and alterations in ion transport including chloride secretion [22][23][24][25][26]. The result is a cascade of excessive inflammation, mediator release, and tissue injury-events that characterize CF lung disease.…”
Section: Oxidative Stress In the Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great majority of this is in the reduced state: 96% of the GSH in ELF of nonsmokers and 98% of that in smokers are reduced. In human epithelial cells, the GSH increase induced by oxidants and cigarette smoke is associated with a simultaneous decrease in CFTR function [26,52]. CFTR function is also decreased in healthy smokers as determined by nasal potential difference measurements [52], a response that may represent an antioxidant defense aimed at transiently increasing mucus viscosity and decreasing GSH loss from epithelial cells.…”
Section: Antioxidants In the Airway Lumen Mucinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La protéine CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) est le seul membre de la famille des protéines ABC à être doté de la fonction d'un canal ionique perméable aux anions plutôt que de celle d'un transporteur actif [3]. Nos travaux récents suggèrent que la protéine CFTR pourrait, tout comme d'autres protéines ABC, jouer un rôle protecteur contre les radicaux libres car elle est fortement modulée par le stress oxydatif [4]. Le canal CFTR permet le déplacement transmembranaire des anions chlorures, du bicarbonate, et vraisemblablement du glutathion, à la surface apicale des cellules épithéliales [5].…”
unclassified
“…Ces mucines offrent une importante barrière protectrice pouvant interagir avec les oxydants [7]. de sodium ; de plus la stimulation du canal CFTR avec de l'isoprotérénol n'induit aucun changement de potentiel trans-épithélial nasal [10]. Chez des sujets sains nonfumeurs, la différence de potentiel est plus faible au repos, mais elle augmente à la suite d'une stimulation à l'isoprotérénol.…”
unclassified