2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxalato as polyatomic coordination center and magnetic coupler in copper(II)-polypyrazole inverse polynuclear complexes and coordination polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, oxalato-bridged Cu(II) chains were reported to show ferromagnetism, although slow magnetic relaxation has not been reported. 24,25 In contrast, the Cu(II) centres of the chain in this study are all ferromagnetically coupled and show slow magnetic relaxation This work thus presents a new insight into the potential of Cu(II) polymer chains that have ferromagnetic interactions and exhibit slow magnetic relaxation, which have traditionally been overlooked.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, oxalato-bridged Cu(II) chains were reported to show ferromagnetism, although slow magnetic relaxation has not been reported. 24,25 In contrast, the Cu(II) centres of the chain in this study are all ferromagnetically coupled and show slow magnetic relaxation This work thus presents a new insight into the potential of Cu(II) polymer chains that have ferromagnetic interactions and exhibit slow magnetic relaxation, which have traditionally been overlooked.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The χ M T versus T and M versus H curves were fitted simultaneously using the PHI software (version 3.1.6, N. Chilton, Manchester, UK) [56], resulting in the following parameters: J = −31.96(2) cm −1 ; J = +1.34(2) cm −1 ; and g = 2.12(1) with R (χT) = 2.21 × 10 −5 , R (MxH 2 . 5K) = 5.32 × 10 −4 and R (MxH 5K) = 9.95 × 10 −4 (R is the agreement factor defined as R = Σ[P exp -P calcd ] 2 /Σ(P exp ) 2 , with P being the measured physical property).…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental magnetic data were analyzed using the spin Hamiltonian given by Equation (1) (with S1 = S2 = S3 = S1' = S2' = S3' = 1/2), where J (J = J12 = J23 = J1'2' = J2'3') and J′ (J′ = J11') are the intra-and intertrinuclear magnetic coupling parameters (Scheme 2), and g is the average Landé factor of the copper(II) ions (g = g1 = g2 = g3 = g1' = g2' = g3'). The χMT versus T and M versus H curves were fitted simultaneously using the PHI software (version 3.1.6, N. Chilton, Manchester, UK) [56], resulting in the following parameters: J = −31.96(2) cm −1 ; J′ = +1.34(2) cm −1 ; and g = 2.12(1) with R(χT) = 2.21 × 10 −5 , R(MxH 2.5K) = 5.32 × 10 −4 and R(MxH 5K) = 9.95 × 10 −4 (R is the agreement factor defined as R = Σ[Pexp-Pcalcd] 2 /Σ(Pexp) 2 , with P being the measured physical property). The theoretical curves match perfectly with the experimental data (Figure 5).…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordination polymers (CPs) have garnered significant interest in crystal chemistry and materials science due to their intriguing structures and potential applications in various fields. These include catalysis (Adamji et al, 2023;Suremann et al, 2023;Wu et al, 2023;Xu et al, 2022), adsorption and separation (Chen et al, 2023;Daglar et al, 2021;Keasler et al, 2023;Liang et al, 2023), fluorescence sensing (Halder et al, 2023;Li et al, 2023), magnetism (Castro et al, 2022;Dong et al, 2023;Weng et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2023), and so on (Biswas et al, 2021;Naskar et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2017). The development of these CPs is commonly recognised to be predominantly influenced by the characteristics of the organic building blocks, the coordination geometry of the inorganic metal nodes and several synthetic parameters (Batten et al, 2016;Han et al, 2014;Rosa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%