Owning Ethical Innovation: Claims about Commercial Wearable Brain Technologies

McCall, Iris Coates; Lau, Chloe; Minielly, Nicole; Illes, Judy

doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.026

Cited by 53 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The breadth of possible brain-interfacing devices poses a challenge for government oversight of this technology ( Coates McCall et al, 2019 ). For example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently regulates medical devices but not low-risk devices used for entertainment or wellness (e.g., mental acuity or relaxation).…”

Section: Discussion Of Neuroethical Issues Of the Potential Brain-interfacing Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies

Gaudry

Ayaz

Bedows³

et al. 2021

Front. Neurosci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditionally, recording from and stimulating the brain with high spatial and temporal resolution required invasive means. However, recently, the technical capabilities of less invasive and non-invasive neuro-interfacing technology have been dramatically improving, and laboratories and funders aim to further improve these capabilities. These technologies can facilitate functions such as multi-person communication, mood regulation and memory recall. We consider a potential future where the less invasive technology is in high demand. Will this demand match that the current-day demand for a smartphone? Here, we draw upon existing research to project which particular neuroethics issues may arise in this potential future and what preparatory steps may be taken to address these issues.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Neuroethical Issues Of the Potential Brain-interfacing Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies

Gaudry

Ayaz

Bedows³

et al. 2021

Front. Neurosci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nonetheless, she correctly acknowledges that the lines are blurred and several DTC products touch "on conditions the treatment of which may also fall into the clinical arena." This is due not only to the health-related big data quandary described above but also to the fact that several DTC make para-clinical claims (Coates McCall et al 2019).…”

Section: Wellness Wellbeing and Human Flourishingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: What Is It and What Is It for?

Ienca

Vayena

2019

AJOB Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Workplace monitoring using wearable biosensors can be used to promote employee safety, productivity, health, and wellness ( 1 , 2 ). Body sensors are growing in popularity, and brain sensors, although more recent, are also being implemented ( 3 – 5 ). Examples of intended workplace applications are fitness trackers that measure sitting time to decrease sedentary behavior in the workplace ( 6 ), wearable sensors that detect lumbar spine movement have been tested to prevent low back pain among workers ( 7 ), and posture sensors to identify work-related fatigue during surgery to reduce musculoskeletal disorders ( 8 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other sensors have the ability to detect concentration, energy expenditure, and emotional responses ( 9 ). For the brain, wearable sensors monitor employee alertness via electrical signals recorded from the scalp with the goal of increasing the safety of operators and drivers ( 3 , 10 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives

Tindale

Chiu

Minielly

et al. 2022

Front. Digit. Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesWearable body and brain sensors are permeating the consumer market and are increasingly being considered for workplace applications with the goal of promoting safety, productivity, health, and wellness. However, the monitoring of physiologic signals in real-time prompts concerns about benefit and risk, ownership of such digital data, data transfer privacy, and the discovery and disclosure of signals of possible health significance. Here we explore the perceptions and perspectives of employers and employees about key ethical considerations regarding the potential use of sensors in the workplace.MethodsWe distributed a survey developed and refined based on key research questions and past literature to a wide range and size of industries in British Columbia, Canada. Both employers (potential Implementers) and employees (potential Users) were invited to participate.ResultsWe received 344 survey responses. Most responses were from construction, healthcare, education, government, and utilities sectors. Across genders, industries, and workplace sizes, we found a convergence of opinions on perceived benefit and concern between potential Implementers and potential Users regarding the motivation to use biosensors in the workplace. Potential Implementers and Users also agreed on issues pertaining to safety, privacy, disclosure of findings of possible medical significance, risks, data ownership, data sharing, and transfer of data between workplaces. The greatest variability between potential Users and Implementers pertained to data ownership.ConclusionStrong agreement in the perception of biosensor use in the workplace between potential Implementers and Users reflects shared interest, motivation, and responsibility for their use. The use of sensors is rapidly increasing, and transparency about key use factors–both practical and ethical–is essential to maintain the current and desirable level of solidarity.

show abstract

Owning Ethical Innovation: Claims about Commercial Wearable Brain Technologies

Abstract: The wearable neurotechnology market targets consumers with promises of cognitive benefit and personal wellness. Scientific evidence is essential to substantiate claims about utility, safety, and efficacy and for informed choice and public trust.

Cited by 53 publications

References 9 publications

Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies

Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies

Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnology: What Is It and What Is It for?

Wearable Biosensors in the Workplace: Perceptions and Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About