2000
DOI: 10.1108/02641610010344783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership versus access: the CISTI source/SUMO experience at McGill University

Abstract: Since November 1996, the Physical Sciences & Engineering Library at McGill University has established a new Subsidised UnMediated Ordering (SUMO) service for its users: the CISTI Source/SUMO service, a one‐stop shopping service where the patrons (faculty, staff and graduate students) can browse the CISTI Source Table of Contents database over the Web, order their articles and have them sent directly to their desktop by CISTI (Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information) without having to search M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Funding options that libraries can consider include:library funded with no limits;library allocation to “departments” – with limits;library pays for free unlimited access to particular titles in lieu of subscriptions;“departmental” allocation from an “acquisition” budget; anduser pays (therefore no patron authentication required).There are many well‐documented studies that attest to the economies of providing a free or subsidised unmediated document delivery to patrons. Three such studies are the University of Sydney, McGill University, and the University of Leeds Document Direct Project 1999‐2000 (de Saxe, 2001; Houle, 2001)[14].…”
Section: Other Ways Of Getting the Items Our Patrons Wantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funding options that libraries can consider include:library funded with no limits;library allocation to “departments” – with limits;library pays for free unlimited access to particular titles in lieu of subscriptions;“departmental” allocation from an “acquisition” budget; anduser pays (therefore no patron authentication required).There are many well‐documented studies that attest to the economies of providing a free or subsidised unmediated document delivery to patrons. Three such studies are the University of Sydney, McGill University, and the University of Leeds Document Direct Project 1999‐2000 (de Saxe, 2001; Houle, 2001)[14].…”
Section: Other Ways Of Getting the Items Our Patrons Wantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two papers discuss the question of ownership versus access to journals. McGill University has introduced a Subsidised Unmediated Ordering system which provides users with a one step service enabling them to search for, order and receive journal articles without any mediation from the library staff (Houle, 2000). The Library for Natural Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences has examined the relative costs of ownership versus access, developing a model based on estimating the cost per use of journal subscriptions, and comparing those with ILL loan costs (Kingma and Mouravieva, 2000).…”
Section: Managing Financesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the literature, a number of different terms are used to refer to end-users requesting articles directly and paying by the article: unmediated document delivery 1 or unmediated document ordering 2 , user initiated document delivery 3 , the 'just-in-time model' 4 , end-user document supply 5 , articles on demand 6 , and payper-view (PPV) 7 . Beginning in the 1990s, libraries began to experiment with PPV as an alternative to traditional forms of inter-library loan (ILL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%