2017
DOI: 10.26905/jkdp.v21i4.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership Structure and Publicness of Firms: A Literature Review

Abstract: There has been an extensive body of literature studying the link between ownership structure and firm performance. Some of them focus on the performance difference across ownership types (i.e. state vs foreign vs private domestic). On the other hand, some studies stress ownership structure on the fraction of ownership based on agency theory (i.e. majority versus minority) and its derivatives (e.g. ultimate ownership, cross listing). However, an important element has not been explored while discussing ownership… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other characteristic that might hamper market for corporate control to work well is the existence of government ownership. It is described that government ownership might have a specific impact on public (Untoro, 2017) and internal governance system that eventually determines the effectiveness of disciplinary mechanisms to work well (Borisova et al, 2015). This view is grounded on the notion that government ownership serves as an implicit guarantee that allows management to escape from potential default consequences (Stiglitz, 1993 Borisova et al (2012) posit that government controlled firm is more likely to put anti-takeover provision and thus prevent external governance mechanisms to discipline management.…”
Section: Multivariatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other characteristic that might hamper market for corporate control to work well is the existence of government ownership. It is described that government ownership might have a specific impact on public (Untoro, 2017) and internal governance system that eventually determines the effectiveness of disciplinary mechanisms to work well (Borisova et al, 2015). This view is grounded on the notion that government ownership serves as an implicit guarantee that allows management to escape from potential default consequences (Stiglitz, 1993 Borisova et al (2012) posit that government controlled firm is more likely to put anti-takeover provision and thus prevent external governance mechanisms to discipline management.…”
Section: Multivariatementioning
confidence: 99%