2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
178
2
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
23
178
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar for REGULATORY, LAWRULE, POLITICS, and CORRUPTION. These indicators which are used popularly in many previous studies evaluate national governance quality [12,18,60]. Due to the high correlation between some components and each other, this study includes individually the indicators in the models.…”
Section: Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar for REGULATORY, LAWRULE, POLITICS, and CORRUPTION. These indicators which are used popularly in many previous studies evaluate national governance quality [12,18,60]. Due to the high correlation between some components and each other, this study includes individually the indicators in the models.…”
Section: Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these papers add the national governance quality as control variables [5]. Others papers include aggregated national governance index, which is a sum of the value of individual indicators [18]. In this paper, the authors mostly employ all indicators of national governance quality and add individually in this paper"s model to avoid their collinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy control for potential endogeneity problem in addition to unobserved heterogeneity. Before proceeding, we first test the endogeneity of the regressors using Durbin-Wu-Hausman (DWH) test for endogeneity of all the regressors (Chi-sq (11) = 38.47; p=0.0001) following Schultz et al (2010) and Nguyen et al (2015).…”
Section: The Estimated Model Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System-GMM reduces the effect of high persistence of corporate governance variables thereby improving the power of estimations (Blundell & Bond, 1998;Nguyen, et al, 2015). In addition, system-GMM appears to be the best-performing estimator for the data which is characterized by moderate length of time, low within firm variations in corporate governance variables, possibility of fixed effects driven dependent variable, some variables are endogenous and a dynamic relationship exists between variables (Filatotchev et al, 2013;Nguyen, et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Estimated Model Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ademais, verificaram que o nível de governança afeta significativamente no conservadorismo e no income smoothing. Esses resultados corroboram os achados em outros segmentos e ambientes econômicos (O´CONNOR; KINSELLA; O´SULLIVAN, 2014;NGUYEN;LOCKE;REDDY, 2015;HABIB;JIANG, 2015). Mussa, Musova e Debnárová (2015) observaram que existe uma relação positiva entre nível de endividamento e a estrutura de governança.…”
Section: Teoria Da Estrutura De Capital E Governança Corporativa: O Qunclassified