Ownership at stake (once again): housing, digital contents, animals and robots

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to discuss the questioning around the current suitability of ownership both for accessing to certain property (housing, to be more specific) and chattels (digital contents, animals and autonomous robots) that have recently flourished, favored by technological advances and the change in the values of the millennials’ in a context of crisis. Design/methodology/approach The process of substitution (e.g. through alternative housing tenures, such as intermediate tenures and collaborative housing, licensing digital contents) or erosion/elimination (e.g. owning animals and robots, tokenization through blockchain) of ownership through key types of property and chattels. Findings Ownership, both of land and goods, is again at the stake. Technological advances and/or new values of millennials in a context of crisis have led to questioning the suitability of ownership to favor universal access to housing, of holding music and other digital contents, have limited the faculties of animals’ and pets’ owners and are favoring the evolution of autonomous robots into subjects of law rather than mere objects. Research limitations/implications Only key property (housing) and chattels are studied (digital contents, animals, robots). There is no broad study of the global current situation of ownership. Practical implications It is discussed how the changes of values and technological advances in a context of crisis have impacted in the strength and reliability of ownership to allow access to property and chattels. Social implications These changes in ownership change how we can access to property (housing) and to chattels (digital media) and even to changes in what is considered “object” such as what is happening in Europe with animals and robots. Originality/value This is a new approach to consequences of the crisis in the field of housing (fractioning of ownership -temporal and shared ownership-, collaborative economy) and a change of values in the new millennial generation (animals) in this context and owing to the advance of the new technologies (robots). Is ownership again at the stake?

The Desirability of Legal Rights for Novel Beings

“…The issue was at the forefront of legal consciousness when Saudi Arabia granted citizenship to a robot named Sofia 85 ; though later exposed to be a publicity stunt, the fact that the issue of citizenship for AI so captured the public imagination suggests that the question of legal personhood for novel beings is one that we need to consider. 86 This is especially true if we believe that developments in technology may give rise to artificial agents whose cognitive abilities are similar to our own, requiring us to more accurately assess whether both future and existing novel beings are true noumenal agents. If it is conceivable that this question may soon be answered in the affirmative, it is better that the law be prepared for their answers than be found wanting.…”

OTDF platform: A new paradigm of homeownership for life with mobility and liquidity

“…Intermediate ownership, including renting, getting licenses, or sharing, emerges as a viable alternative. 8 On the one hand, digital rental-focused platforms, such as Airbnb and Vrbo, offer immediate rental services. However, participation in exchanges within those platforms predominantly revolves around usage rights, representing only a fraction of ownership.…”