2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.555915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OWL opto-mechanics: phase A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary analyses indicate that the telescope kinematics should be able to point and track to sub-arc second accuracy [10]. Field stabilization is required to compensate for the effect of wind on the primary and secondary mirrors, and to a lesser extent on the corrector.…”
Section: Wavefront Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Preliminary analyses indicate that the telescope kinematics should be able to point and track to sub-arc second accuracy [10]. Field stabilization is required to compensate for the effect of wind on the primary and secondary mirrors, and to a lesser extent on the corrector.…”
Section: Wavefront Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By design, OWL is insensitive to lateral M1-M2 decenters, and the parallelogram-shaped structural modules tend to naturally favour lateral decenters over tilt. The structure being mostly exposed to laminar wind flow, image motion is essentially quasi-static and within the correction range of field stabilization with M6 [10].…”
Section: Wavefront Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations