The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2002.1046575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OVSF codes assignment and reassignment at the forward link of W-CDMA 3G systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the ratio of chips per data symbol is, the higher data the rate will be. Observe that channelization codes in the WCDMA system normally adopt the orthogonal variable spreading factor (OVSF) codes [3][4][5]12,13,15,[17][18][19] to identify the down/up-link channels. Both down-links and up-links in a WCDMA system apply OVSF codes to match the requested data rate.…”
Section: Basic Idea and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The higher the ratio of chips per data symbol is, the higher data the rate will be. Observe that channelization codes in the WCDMA system normally adopt the orthogonal variable spreading factor (OVSF) codes [3][4][5]12,13,15,[17][18][19] to identify the down/up-link channels. Both down-links and up-links in a WCDMA system apply OVSF codes to match the requested data rate.…”
Section: Basic Idea and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OVSF codes are arranged in a tree structure for code allocation purposes [3][4][5]12,13,15,[17][18][19]. The allocation rule of the OVSF code tree is shown in figure 3(a).…”
Section: Basic Idea and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 gives a valid tree node assignment. The tree node assignment problem can be considered as a general resource allocation problem, which can model the specific problems, such as the Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factor (OVSF) code assignment problem [2,3,7,12,13,14,15,16,17], the buddy memory allocation problem [1,5,10,11], and the hypercube subcube allocation problem [6]. The main difference between these problems is how the resource, the nodes at level i, for 0 ≤ i ≤ h, are interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%