2019
DOI: 10.2478/s11686-019-00106-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovine Abortion by Neospora caninum: First Case Reported in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In Spanish sheep flocks, the seroprevalence of N. caninum ranged from 1.9% to 10.1% [33][34][35][36]. However, in flocks with reproductive failure associated with N. caninum infection, the seroprevalence was higher (30-34%) [8,10] and similar to the seroprevalence rate (32%) found in this study. Moreover, the histological lesions compatible with N. caninum infection and the high N. caninum DNA detection rate found in placentas and aborted foetuses from seropositive and aborted dams corroborated that N. caninum was a major cause of abortions in the investigated flock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Spanish sheep flocks, the seroprevalence of N. caninum ranged from 1.9% to 10.1% [33][34][35][36]. However, in flocks with reproductive failure associated with N. caninum infection, the seroprevalence was higher (30-34%) [8,10] and similar to the seroprevalence rate (32%) found in this study. Moreover, the histological lesions compatible with N. caninum infection and the high N. caninum DNA detection rate found in placentas and aborted foetuses from seropositive and aborted dams corroborated that N. caninum was a major cause of abortions in the investigated flock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The abortion rate in this flock reached 25.6% in 2018, which is far above the 5% considered acceptable [39]. An abortion rate higher than 5% was previously described in ovine flocks with N. caninum-associated abortions [5,10]. The presence of stillbirths was registered; however, contrary to previous studies [8][9][10], stillbirths were not differentiated from foetal losses during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations