2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oviduct binding ability of porcine spermatozoa develops in the epididymis and can be advanced by incubation with caudal fluid

Abstract: Abstract.The sperm reservoir is formed when spermatozoa bind to the epithelium of the utero-tubal junction and caudal isthmus of the oviduct. It is an important mechanism that helps synchronize the meeting of gametes by regulating untimely capacitation and polyspermic fertilisation. This study investigated the influence of epididymal maturation and caudal fluid on the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct epithelium using a model porcine oviduct explant assay. Spermatozoa from the rete testis, middle caput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sperm kinematics of frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm were higher than corpus and cauda epididymal sperm, contrary to previous reports in horses [2,3,45,46], pigs [47], and goats [48], which observed that the motility parameters and PMI after thawing were similar in ejaculated and epididymal sperm [3]. Moreover, the TM and PM of cauda epididymal sperm were lower than that described by Papa et al [1] and Monteiro et al [3]; probably, the age factor may have influenced the results as stallions aged between 34 and 38 months were used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sperm kinematics of frozen-thawed ejaculated sperm were higher than corpus and cauda epididymal sperm, contrary to previous reports in horses [2,3,45,46], pigs [47], and goats [48], which observed that the motility parameters and PMI after thawing were similar in ejaculated and epididymal sperm [3]. Moreover, the TM and PM of cauda epididymal sperm were lower than that described by Papa et al [1] and Monteiro et al [3]; probably, the age factor may have influenced the results as stallions aged between 34 and 38 months were used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The sperm cryopreservation causes damage to plasma membrane [55], leading to a reduced number of sperm with the ability to bind to oviductal cells [36]. However, in this study, the cryopreservation process did not affect the binding capacity of ejaculated or epididymal spermatozoa, unlike other studies that observed a decrease in binding capacity of frozen-thawed sperm to OECs [47,51,56]. Factors such as the freezing extender and/or freezing protocol used in this study may have provided greater protection to sperm during the cryopreservation process, preserving the binding capacity of ejaculated and epididymal sperm cells.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motility and sperm head characteristics were derived from at least 200 spermatozoa across five random fields. This was achieved by loading each chamber of 38°C pre-warmed Leja Standard Count 4 Chamber Slides (Leja Products, Nieuw-Vennep, Netherlands) with 3 μL of 20 x 10 6 sperm/mL semen in BTS as previously described [61]. The CASA software was calibrated to the following settings: analysis set-up #7: BOAR; frames acquired, 40/sec; frame rate, 50 Hz; minimum contrast, 60%; minimum cell size, two pixels; minimum static contrast, 30%; straightness threshold, 71.4%; low average-path velocity (VAP) cut-off, 5.0 μm/sec; medium VAP cut-off, 22.0 μm/sec; low straight-line velocity (VSL) cut-off, 11.0 μm/sec; head size (non-motile), two pixels; head intensity (non-motile), 70 pixels; static head size, 0.10–10.0 pixels; static head intensity, 0.10–0.95 pixels; static elongation, 0–60; count slow cells as motile, YES; magnification, 3.20; video source, camera; video frequency, 50; brightfield, NO; illumination intensity, 2381 and temperature, 38°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 200 spermatozoa across five random fields were examined per sample. Motility characteristics of spermatozoa were analysed as previously described (Peña et al 2015). The CASA software was calibrated to the following settings: analysis set-up #7: BOAR; frames acquired, 40 s À1 ; frame rate, 50 Hz; minimum contrast, 60%; minimum cell size, two pixels; minimum static contrast, 30%; straightness threshold, 71.4%; low average-path velocity (VAP) cut-off, 5.0 mm s À1 ; medium VAP cut-off, 22.0 mm s À1 ; low straight-line velocity (VSL) cut-off, 11.0 mm s À1 ; head size (non-motile), two pixels; head intensity (non-motile), 70 pixels; static head size, 0.10-10.0 pixels; static head intensity, 0.10-0.95 pixels; static elongation, 0-60; count slow cells as motile, YES; magnification, 3.20; video source, camera; video frequency, 50; brightfield, NO; illumination intensity, 2381 and temperature, 388C.…”
Section: Seasonal Semen Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%