Overview on Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Bu çalışmada vasküler cerrahi konulu literatürün incelenmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmada dokuman araştırma yöntemlerinden bibliyometrik analiz metodu kullanıldı. Bibliyometrik veri tabanlarından olan Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanı anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak değerlendirme yapıldı. Arama dili olarak İngilizce tercih edildi. Arama çubuğu kısmında'vascular surgery' yazılarak yayınlara ulaşıldı. Sadece araştırma makaleleri değerlendirildi. Yayınlar yıllara göre dağılım, ülke, kurum, yayınlandıkları dergi, finansal destek sağlayan kuruluşlara göre ayrıntılı olarak değerlendirildi. 67166 yayına ulaşıldı. Sadece araştırma makaleleri araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturduğundan 55508'i araştırma makalesi ayrıntılı olarak incelendi.

Global Trends in Trachoma

“…The current analysis follows the same patterns as many earlier bibliometric studies in many fields, confirming the USA as a global research leader in both quantitative and qualitative terms (Dindar Demiray et al, 2021;Mızrakçı S, 2022;Şahin S.,2022). Keywords play an important role to locate any research in showing the required document.…”

“…Databases that allow quick and extensive data analysis, such as Pubmed, EBSCO, Scopus, Pro-Quest, and Web of Science, are often used for bibliometric analysis. Additionally, this approach may be used to evaluate other sources such as any database, theses, journals, conferences, and so on (Alkan Çeviker et al, 2021;Dindar Demiray et al, 2021;Durgun et al2022;Küçük et al2021;Mızrakçı S, 2022;Nichols et al2021;Öntürk et al2021;Özlü A,2022;Özlü, 2021;Şahin S.,2022;Tahmaz et al,2022;Yıldız E., 2022). We believe that the scientific effectiveness of serious diseases, as well as many other areas in health, should be assessed using this technique, and that a roadmap for future research should be formed.…”

Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Bibliometric Evaluation Using the Web of Science Versus Scopus Databases

“…To assess the validity of these data sources for bibliometric analyses and research evaluations, the majority of early empirical comparisons mainly concentrated on overall content coverage and overlap between the databases or with other data sources, as well as the statistics derived from these databases. The key findings of these early research have been reported in numerous comprehensive literature reviews and have been discussed frequently in the literature reviews of later investigations (Hancı et al, 2021;Gökçe and Alkan, 20222;Gürler et al, 2021;Şahin, 2022;Alkan et al, 2022;Alkan et al, 2021;Öntürk et al, 2022;Pranckute et al, 2022;Kuyubaşı et al 2023;Şahin and Alkan, 20222).…”

“…The two databases provide reliable instruments for gauging science at the national level. To determine whether these findings hold true at smaller scales, further study employing extensive datasets should look at variations at the institutional level as well as in various disciplines (alRyalat et al, 2019;Archambault et al, 2009;Hancı et al, 2021;Gürler et al, 2021;Şahin, 2022;Alkan et al, 2022;Alkan et al, 2021;Öntürk et al, 2022). Despite the significant biases and restrictions that both WoS and Scopus have, the author believes that Scopus is better suited for assessing research findings and carrying out daily chores for a number of reasons.…”

Analysis of Scientific Outputs on Prosthetic Infections

“…, 2021;Gürler ve ark., 2021; Küçük ve ark., 2021;Özlü, 2021; Ekici ve ark., 2022;Mızrakçı, 2022;Özlü, 2022;Şahin, 2022; Uyar ve ark., 2022;Yıldız, 2022). Ancak global olarak da birçok alanda olduğu gibi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji alanında da bu tür yayınların sayısı artış Black…”