2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06596-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the Ocular Biomechanical Properties Measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Corvis ST tonometer, the basics of biomechanical parameters measurements are based on the analysis of the dynamic corneal deformation recorded by the ultra-fast Scheimpflug camera. Thanks to the possibility of reconstructing the full process of corneal deformation and observation of its dynamic changes in the video, the Corvis ST tonometer allows to obtain a much bigger number of quantitative parameters that are the basis for the description of biomechanical changes during the examination [3236]. Various methods of image analysis and processing [3739], or artificial intelligence methods and others [4042] can be applied for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Corvis ST tonometer, the basics of biomechanical parameters measurements are based on the analysis of the dynamic corneal deformation recorded by the ultra-fast Scheimpflug camera. Thanks to the possibility of reconstructing the full process of corneal deformation and observation of its dynamic changes in the video, the Corvis ST tonometer allows to obtain a much bigger number of quantitative parameters that are the basis for the description of biomechanical changes during the examination [3236]. Various methods of image analysis and processing [3739], or artificial intelligence methods and others [4042] can be applied for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocular Response Analyzer) for the detection of corneal biomechanics rely on large magnitude (millimeter-scale) global deformations of the eye [10], which causes nonlinear corneal response to the mechanical stimulation, leading to inaccurate measurement [11]. Also, the lack of depth-resolved detection limits the clinical usefulness of these techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained measurement results | n bl ( i ) − n br ( i )| ( Figure 4(d) ) confirm the cutoff vibration change of 0.2, 0.3 mm. The locations of points n bl and n br are also shown on the 3D reconstruction, in Figure 5 , which can be performed by using basic data concerning biomechanics of the cornea (mainly viscoelasticity) and its possible deformations [ 42 , 44 , 61 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%