1999
DOI: 10.1121/1.424948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the hydroacoustic monitoring system for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

Abstract: A global hydroacoustic monitoring system is being implemented for use in verification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). This system will provide hydroacoustic monitoring of all the world’s oceans for 24 h a day, every day of the year, into the indefinite future. This unique resource will utilize two types of station. One type will be based on a hydrophone at the SOFAR axis depth, cabled back to shore. The other will be based on a seismometer on a small island using detection of the T-phase s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lawrence 1999). In this framework, it is rapidly becoming impossible to fully catalogue all observations of cryosignals, and the present paper has no pretence of completeness in this respect.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lawrence 1999). In this framework, it is rapidly becoming impossible to fully catalogue all observations of cryosignals, and the present paper has no pretence of completeness in this respect.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since our initial identification of cryosignals in Paper I, a large number of additional observations have been reported Pulli et al 2004;Chapp et al 2004), using both land-based seismographs and the new hydrophone stations currently being de-ployed as part of the International Monitoring System of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (e.g. Lawrence 1999). In this framework, it is rapidly becoming impossible to fully catalogue all observations of cryosignals, and the present paper has no pretence of completeness in this respect.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The CTBT verification regime relies in part on the International Monitoring System (IMS), a global network of facilities to detect nuclear explosions. Seismic (Kvaerna and Ringdal, 2013), hydroacoustic (Lawrence, 1999), infrasound (Green and Bowers, 2010), and radio-nuclide verification (Schoeppner, 2017) technologies comprise the IMS and are distributed across 337 stations and laboratories to moni-tor for nuclear explosions conducted on Earth (CTBTO, 2018). Currently, the most sensitive means for detecting underground nuclear explosions are seismic, which can detect and identify explosions down to or below a yield of about 1 kiloton worldwide.…”
Section: A Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of localization of Antarctic ice breaking events by a single hydroacoustic station of the hydroacoustic network deployed in the Indian Ocean as part of the International Monitoring System (IMS) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Data from the HA01 station located about 150 km north-west of Cape Leeuwin in Western Australia [1] are used for analysis. Based on bearing estimation at hydroacoustic stations [2], as well as the signal travel times expected from an acoustic propagation model, the sources of underwater noise can be located using hydroacoustic International Monitoring System (IMS) network, providing the signals are detected by more than one hydroacoustic station with a high signal-to-noise-ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%