2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98253-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the HECKTOR Challenge at MICCAI 2021: Automatic Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation and Outcome Prediction in PET/CT Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following sections, we first introduce the data provided by the MICCAI 2020 HEad and neCK TumOR segmentation and outcome prediction (HECKTOR) challenge [6,7]. Our proposed methods and training scheme are additionally explained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following sections, we first introduce the data provided by the MICCAI 2020 HEad and neCK TumOR segmentation and outcome prediction (HECKTOR) challenge [6,7]. Our proposed methods and training scheme are additionally explained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HECKTOR (HEad and neCK TumOR) 2021 challenge is the successor of the HECKTOR 2020, both aimed to improve the automatic segmentation methods for head and neck cancer based on PET and CT images [7,8]. In addition, this year the challenge has been extended to include outcome prediction in patients using both image and clinical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are proposing a multimodal machine learning algorithm that, without prior information on the exact location of the tumor, utilizes both tabular and imaging data for the prognosis of Progression Free Survival (PFS) for patients who have H&N oropharyngeal cancer. This work is carried out to address the prognosis task of the MICCAI 2021 Head and Neck Tumor segmentation and outcome prediction challenge (HECKTOR) [2][1]. Visualization of the EHR data was performed to observe the distribution of patients in terms of gender and age, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%