2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15751-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the CLEF 2009 Medical Image Retrieval Track

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to this, the importance of solid benchmarking protocols and publicly available databases has been confirmed repeatedly, e.g., in the machine vision and image analysis communities [8], [9], where the consensus is that it promotes comparison between methods and pushes forward progress. In addition to this, in the studies presented so far the number of considered movements is typically quite far from the dexterity of a human hand or from what a patient would need in daily life; at the same time, acquiring data only from few subjects makes it difficult to evaluate the generality of the obtained results across gender, age, characteristics of the amputation, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to this, the importance of solid benchmarking protocols and publicly available databases has been confirmed repeatedly, e.g., in the machine vision and image analysis communities [8], [9], where the consensus is that it promotes comparison between methods and pushes forward progress. In addition to this, in the studies presented so far the number of considered movements is typically quite far from the dexterity of a human hand or from what a patient would need in daily life; at the same time, acquiring data only from few subjects makes it difficult to evaluate the generality of the obtained results across gender, age, characteristics of the amputation, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our investigation was conducted under the auspices of the ImageCLEF 2010 medical image retrieval challenge [5]. The medical task within ImageCLEF was initiated in 2004 with the goal of providing an evaluation forum for researchers in both text-and content-based image retrieval techniques to compare their techniques using a common dataset and a well understood set of evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of standardized test collections has limited medical image retrieval research [3]. The annual ImageCLEF conference, begun in 2003 as part of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF), has addressed the need for standardized test collections and multi-institutional evaluation forums, and has grown to become the pre-eminent venue for image retrieval evaluation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when services like TinEye, GazoPa or Google Images offer content-based visual searches, the query text based or keywords search are still the preferred way to access web images. This fact is supported by the high accuracy that text query-based systems can get compared to visual query-based systems [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%