2008
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2007.913935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the 63000 PWO Barrel Crystals for CMS_ECAL Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another difference between data and simulation, relevant to electron-photon differences, is the modelling of the varying fraction of scintillation light reaching the photodetector as a function of the longitudinal depth in the crystal at which it was emitted. Ensuring adequate uniformity was a major accomplishment in the lead tungstate crystal development that was achieved by depolishing one face of each barrel crystal, but an uncertainty in the degree of uniformity achieved remains [86,87]. In addition, the uniformity is modified by the radiation-induced loss of transparency of the crystals.…”
Section: Statistical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difference between data and simulation, relevant to electron-photon differences, is the modelling of the varying fraction of scintillation light reaching the photodetector as a function of the longitudinal depth in the crystal at which it was emitted. Ensuring adequate uniformity was a major accomplishment in the lead tungstate crystal development that was achieved by depolishing one face of each barrel crystal, but an uncertainty in the degree of uniformity achieved remains [86,87]. In addition, the uniformity is modified by the radiation-induced loss of transparency of the crystals.…”
Section: Statistical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality is excellent with most of the performance well above the specification value, as a result of a strict quality control procedure [4]. This is illustrated on Fig.…”
Section: A Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To simulate nonuniformity of light collection, an appropriate slope is introduced based on laboratory light-collection efficiency measurements made on the crystals, and measurements of its dependence on crystal transparency. The slope of the light collection efficiency as a function of depth, at the time when the ECAL was constructed, is taken to be −0.14 ± 0.08%/X 0 [29,30], for the front half of the crystal ("front nonuniformity"). The change of this slope, ∆F, is parametrized as a function of the absorption coef-ficient induced by irradiation measured in m −1 , ∆µ, and is given by ∆F = 0.4% × ∆µ/X 0 [31].…”
Section: Energy Scale Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%