Overview of Significant Changes in the Minimum Data Set for Nursing Homes Version 3.0

Saliba, Debra; Jones, Malia; Streim, Joel E.; Ouslander, Joseph G.; Berlowitz, Dan R.; Buchanan, Joan L.

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.001

Cited by 129 publications

(95 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…20 Several changes occur in MDS 3.0 versus 2.0, including new assessment items for some physical (eg, skin, bladder, and bowel conditions) and psychological functioning (eg, cognition, mood, and behavior patterns), as well as the involvement of residents in assessments of their mood and mental status. 21 Nevertheless, our algorithm developed with MDS 2.0 can be applied with MDS 3.0 because all service date variables remain the same between these 2 versions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algorithm for Identifying Nursing Home Days Using Medicare Claims and Minimum Data Set Assessment Data

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algorithm for Identifying Nursing Home Days Using Medicare Claims and Minimum Data Set Assessment Data

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It, along with the DRS embedded in the earlier version MDS 2.0 that is used now in Canadian nursing homes, are the only two instruments out of the nine reviewed that are used for mandatory screening for depression in residential care facilities in the United States and Canada. The Mood Questionnaire is currently the most robust and effective scale, owing to its excellent performance in detecting depression in older adults regardless of cognitive status, its simple response format, brevity, strong agreement with the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, and its availability in a self-report and observational versions (Rahman & Appelbaum, 2009;Saliba & Buchanan, 2008;Saliba, Jones, et al, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since 2010, when MDS 3.0 replaced the MDS 2.0 in all US nursing homes (Saliba, Jones, et al, 2012), depression has been screened using this modified version of the PHQ-9, called the Mood Questionnaire. In the Mood Questionnaire, each yes/no item inquires about the presence of specific depression symptoms with subsequent optional elaboration of the response to the frequency scale.…”

Section: The Mood Questionnaire (Phq-9 Modified)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening for Geriatric Depression in Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Narrative Review

Azulai

Walsh

2014

Journal of Gerontological Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies in residential care facilities suggest that routine screening can assist in the early detection of geriatric depression. However, the effectiveness of screening instruments in residential care in the US and Canada has not been adequately evaluated. We conducted a systematic narrative review of the English-language literature published between 2000 and 2010 on screening instruments used for depression detection in older adults living in residential care facilities. The review yielded nine scales and their modifications tested in residential care, which we evaluated. We provide specific recommendations for the use of effective scales and discuss implications for practice, policy and research.

show abstract

“…1 The designers of the MDS 3.0 posited that having residents involved in the assessment process would promote resident-centered care and improve the accuracy of reporting subjective states such as pain, mood, and cognition. 2,3 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 introduced the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home (NH) residents. Not all residents are able to complete the BIMS and are consequently assessed by staff. We designed a Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) integrating self-report and staff-report data and present evidence of the scale’s construct validity. Design Retrospective cohort study. Subjects Consisted of three cohorts: 1) long-stay NH residents (N=941,077) and 2) new admissions (N=2,066,580) during 2011–2012, and 3) residents with the older MDS 2.0 assessment in 2010 and the newer MDS 3.0 assessment (n=688,511). Measures MDS 3.0 items were used to create a single, integrated four-category hierarchical CFS that was compared to residents’ prior MDS 2.0 Cognitive Performance Scale scores and other concurrent MDS 3.0 measures of construct validity. Results The new CFS suggests that 28% of the long-stay cohort in 2011–2012 were cognitively intact, 22% were mildly impaired, 33% were moderately impaired, and 17% were severely impaired. For the admission cohort, the CFS noted 56% as cognitively intact, 23% as mildly impaired, 17% as moderately impaired, and 4% as severely impaired. The CFS corresponded closely with residents’ prior MDS 2.0 Cognitive Performance Scale scores and with performance of Activities of Daily Living, and nurses’ judgments of function and behavior in both the admission and long-stay cohorts. Conclusion The new CFS is valuable to researchers as it provides a single, integrated measure of NH residents’ cognitive function, regardless of the mode of assessment.

show abstract

Overview of Significant Changes in the Minimum Data Set for Nursing Homes Version 3.0

Cited by 129 publications

References 36 publications

Algorithm for Identifying Nursing Home Days Using Medicare Claims and Minimum Data Set Assessment Data

Algorithm for Identifying Nursing Home Days Using Medicare Claims and Minimum Data Set Assessment Data

Screening for Geriatric Depression in Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Narrative Review

The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About