1987
DOI: 10.1177/019874298701200408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Research on Social Interaction: A Historical and Personal Perspective

Abstract: This article presents a review of research on social interaction that was conducted by the author, students, and colleagues, primarily at George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University. The article traces the history and presents both successes and failures of our research in gaining information regarding the development of social interaction skills of handicapped (i.e., behaviorally disordered and mentally retarded) children. Several suggestions are made for future research and development areas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 For this paper, we focus on the development of ‘social interaction,’ which is the reciprocal process of initiating and responding to social stimuli presented by others. 13 We followed the work of Howes 14 and quantified the amount of time spent in 4 categories: peer interaction and teacher interaction, which are both referred to as ‘interactive’ behaviors, as well as parallel play and solitary, which are referred to as ‘non interactive’ behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For this paper, we focus on the development of ‘social interaction,’ which is the reciprocal process of initiating and responding to social stimuli presented by others. 13 We followed the work of Howes 14 and quantified the amount of time spent in 4 categories: peer interaction and teacher interaction, which are both referred to as ‘interactive’ behaviors, as well as parallel play and solitary, which are referred to as ‘non interactive’ behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carr and Darcy (1990), for example, used peer instruction and imitation training to improve play behaviors for students with severe autism. Others have demonstrated the effectiveness of peer-and teacherdirected training to increase social skills of students with autism as well as to improve peer acceptance (see Odom, McConnell, & McEvoy, 1992;Shores, 1987;Simpson, Smith-Myles, Sasso, & Kamps, 1991, for reviews). Procedures include (a) the use of multiple peer exemplars (Fox, Shores, Lindeman, & Strain, 1986); (b) peer initiation, prompting, and reinforcement strategies (Goldstein, Kaczmarek, Pennington, & Shafer, 1992;Knapczyk, 1989;Odom, Chandler, Ostrosky, McConnell, & Reaney, 1992;Odom & Strain, 1986;Sasso, Hughes, Swanson, & Novak, 1987;Shafer, Egel, & Neef, 1984); and (c) group social games and affection activities (Brown, Ragland, & Fox, 1988;McEvoy, Twardosz, & Bishop, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, friendship awareness activities and peer tutor programs have been implemented in school settings (e.g., Fritz, 1990;Haring, Breen, Pitts-Conway, Lee, & Gaylord-Ross, 1987;Shores, 1987), and a few experimental studies have been conducted in residential settings. Such studies have included teaching social behaviors in an institutional setting (Dong, 1977;Singh & Winton, 1983), fostering social integration and friendship in the local community (Cooley, Singer, & Irvin, 1989;Newton & Homer, in press), increasing social initiations and reciprocal interactions in the natural home (James & Egel, 1986), and training peer tutors to teach community skills to individuals with disabilities (Blew, Schwartz, & Luce, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%