Epidemiology - Current Perspectives on Research and Practice 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Pharmacoepidemiological Databases in the Assessment of Medicines Under Real-Life Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IM systems operated either in countries with non-existing or weak monitoring SR schemes, such as sub-Saharan African countries (23, 139), or in countries that have the most widely used record-linkage databases in the world for drug research, such as the UK (e.g., Clinical Practice Research Datalink) (140) or the Netherlands (e.g., PHARMO) (141)—picturing the contribution of IM systems in the real-world evidence generation data. Regardless the differences found within the methodologies used, these schemes were developed with the purpose of filling the gap between RCT (high internal validity and low external validity) (142, 143), SR data (limited by under and selective reporting) (25, 144) and automated database studies (their large size and their longer follow-up times and representativeness make it possible to study real-world effectiveness and safety, but they are usually poor in detailed covariate data) (145, 146). Based on event monitoring and by tracking patients and drug use in a life-cycle based fashion, the results originating from IM studies encompasses the identification/quantification of factors that possibly negatively affect the benefit/risk balance, including (new) adverse events (identification and strengthening of signals), increase of knowledge of drug utilization patterns, identification of off-label use, among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IM systems operated either in countries with non-existing or weak monitoring SR schemes, such as sub-Saharan African countries (23, 139), or in countries that have the most widely used record-linkage databases in the world for drug research, such as the UK (e.g., Clinical Practice Research Datalink) (140) or the Netherlands (e.g., PHARMO) (141)—picturing the contribution of IM systems in the real-world evidence generation data. Regardless the differences found within the methodologies used, these schemes were developed with the purpose of filling the gap between RCT (high internal validity and low external validity) (142, 143), SR data (limited by under and selective reporting) (25, 144) and automated database studies (their large size and their longer follow-up times and representativeness make it possible to study real-world effectiveness and safety, but they are usually poor in detailed covariate data) (145, 146). Based on event monitoring and by tracking patients and drug use in a life-cycle based fashion, the results originating from IM studies encompasses the identification/quantification of factors that possibly negatively affect the benefit/risk balance, including (new) adverse events (identification and strengthening of signals), increase of knowledge of drug utilization patterns, identification of off-label use, among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed sequentially ordered case by case rules were presented mathematically. To the best of our knowledge, no robust algorithmic approach has yet been reported to evaluate treatment duration with individual medications in multiple treatment scenario [22,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative examples include the UK Clinical Practice Research Database and Centricity TM EMR (CEMR) database of USA [27,28]. The extraction, quality control and management of such voluminous longitudinal data under individual study protocols is highly methodologically and computationally involved, and challenging from data mining and analytical viewpoints [22,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of computerised databases has led to a significant reduction in adverse events and prescription errors [19,20], shorter hospital stays and lower mortality [21], along with better patient tracking, information exchange, efficient handling of information, and real-time data provision [16,22]. Large New Insights into the Future of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety pharmacoepidemiology data bases facilitate research, but they require well trained personnel to produce and handle big data [17,23]. The use of electronic data has led to a significant reduction in the manual effort of data collection, easy incorporation of regional data into a study, minimal need for recalls, and removal of interviewer bias [24].…”
Section: Computational and Statistical Models In Pharmacoepidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%