Overview of national health reporting in the EU and quality criteria for public health reports – results of the Joint Action InfAct

Abstract

Background Health reporting shall provide up-to-date health-related data to inform policy-makers, researchers and the public. To this end, health reporting formats should be tailored to the needs and competencies of the target groups and provide comparable and high-quality information. Within the Joint Action on Health Information ‘InfAct’, we aimed at gaining an overview of health reporting practices in the EU Member States and associated countries, and developed quality criteria for the preparation of public health reports. The results are intended to facilitate making health information adequately available while reducing inequalities in health reporting across the EU. Methods A web-based desk research was conducted among EU Member States and associated countries to generate an overview of different formats of national health reporting and their respective target groups. To identify possible quality criteria for public health reports, an exploratory literature review was performed and earlier projects were analysed. The final set of criteria was developed in exchange with experts from the InfAct consortium. Results The web-based desk research showed that public health reports are the most frequently used format across countries (94%), most often addressed to scientists and researchers (51%), politicians and decision-makers (41%). However, across all reporting formats, the general public is the most frequently addressed target group. With regards to quality criteria for public health reports, the literature review has yielded few results. Therefore, two earlier projects served as main sources: the ‘Evaluation of National and Regional Public Health Reports’ and the guideline ‘Good Practice in Health Reporting‘from Germany. In collaboration with experts, quality criteria were identified and grouped into eight categories, ranging from topic selection to presentation of results, and compiled in a checklist for easy reference. Conclusion Health reporting practices in the EU are heterogeneous across Member States. The assembled quality criteria are intended to facilitate the preparation, dissemination and access to better comparable high-quality public health reports as a basis for evidence-based decision-making. A comprehensive conceptual and integrative approach that incorporates the policy perspective would be useful to investigate which dissemination strategies are the most suitable for specific requirements of the targeted groups.

Monitoring Health Inequalities in 12 European Countries: Lessons Learned from the Joint Action Health Equity Europe

“…Both reasons are strong arguments for dialogue between policymakers, professionals, and researchers on how to align health inequality monitoring with policy objectives, provided that there is a sincere political will to employ evidence-based interventions. However, this kind of dialogue does not yet seem to be in place, as our study and others [23] have concluded. A third reason contributing to the modest communication and evaluation of monitoring practices could be the fact that some experts did not regard the country as having any monitoring of health inequalities in place.…”

Innovative Methods Used in Monitoring COVID-19 in Europe: A Multinational Study

“…The documentations regarding public health measures should be accurate, in plain language, and easily accessible. An effective dissemination of health information could be achieved by considering the intended target groups and choosing the appropriate reporting format [35]. In addition, public health interventions to improve general health and vaccine literacy, especially among vulnerable populations (e.g., the elderly, migrants, the homeless) should be a political priority [36,37].…”

European Health Information Portal: a one-stop shop for health information

“…The concept and development of the Health Information Portal (HIP) 12 started during the InfAct Joint Action in 2018–21. The status of availability of health information, including health and healthcare service-related data, research networks 7 and projects, health reporting 13 and capacity-building activities 14 in Europe was reviewed. The review demonstrated severe and worrisome fragmentation of the information resulting in the recommendation to establish a European health information infrastructure 15 where the HIP would be one of the key pillars provided to strengthen evidence-informed policymaking and research.…”