2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of low GWP mixtures for the replacement of HFC refrigerants: R134a, R404A and R410A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Extended refrigeration of food would also mean reduced food losses, which apart from having important implications for meeting nutritional needs, would also contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions from food production and better use of the 23 %-24 % of global cropland and fertilizers currently used to produce food that is eventually wasted (Kummu et al, 2012;Hiç et al, 2016). Hence, reducing global food supply chain losses have several important secondary benefits including conservation of energy and other resources (Kummu et al, 2012) as these are freed up to be converted into other productive activities (Ingram, 2011;Beddington et al, 2012;Kummu et al, 2012;Hiç et al, 2016;Lamb et al, 2016). Due to a lack of detailed information on impacts on food supply chains, such secondary benefits from extended use of industrial and commercial refrigeration and refrigerated transport are not considered in this study.…”
Section: Baseline Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extended refrigeration of food would also mean reduced food losses, which apart from having important implications for meeting nutritional needs, would also contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions from food production and better use of the 23 %-24 % of global cropland and fertilizers currently used to produce food that is eventually wasted (Kummu et al, 2012;Hiç et al, 2016). Hence, reducing global food supply chain losses have several important secondary benefits including conservation of energy and other resources (Kummu et al, 2012) as these are freed up to be converted into other productive activities (Ingram, 2011;Beddington et al, 2012;Kummu et al, 2012;Hiç et al, 2016;Lamb et al, 2016). Due to a lack of detailed information on impacts on food supply chains, such secondary benefits from extended use of industrial and commercial refrigeration and refrigerated transport are not considered in this study.…”
Section: Baseline Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purohit et al, 2018). In recent years, there has been a focus on natural refrigerants (pressurized CO 2 , hydrocarbons, and ammonia), low-GWP HFCs, and HFOs used alone or in blends with HFCs to replace fluids with high-GWP (Beshr et al, 2015;McLinden et al, 2017;Anderson et al, 2020;Heredia-Aricapa et al, 2020). A recent increased use of hydrocarbons (e.g., isobutane and propane), ammonia, and pressurized carbon dioxide is expected to continue into the future (UNEP, 2016a).…”
Section: Alternatives To High-gwp Hfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R134A, is a generation of HFC that possess zero ODP and a GWP = 1800 [14], that was developed for the R22, but it has a low refrigerant effect. The R513A, R515A, R450A, R456A were developed to be alternatives to R134, but the performances of all refrigerants were nearly [15][16][17][18], subsequently, the refrigerant developed to the R404A. The fourth generation R404A was the baseline for this research, and is currently the most used refrigerant, as shown Figure 5 below [7].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Refrigerantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth generation R404A was the baseline for this research, and is currently the most used refrigerant, as shown Figure 5 below [7]. The R404A is a near azeotropic blend of 143a/125/134a, with zero ODP but a GWP = 3922 [16]. Fourth generations are hydrofluoroolefins (HFO) with low GWP and low capacity.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Refrigerantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R32 is low-GWP, zero-ODP, high-capacity, and nontoxic, but operates under high pressure and is not flammable, which is in contrast to R134A, which possesses highly similar properties but can operate under low pressure and has low capacity. Systems that operate with R22 [40], R407C [41], R417A [42], R422A [43], R422D [44], R424A [45], R427A [46], and R453A [47] were developed as an alternative to R22 and mixed with HCs and HFCs, as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Systems that operate with R134A [48], R450A [49], R456A [50], R513A [51], and R515A [50] were developed as an alternative to R134A, and mixed with HCs, HFCs, and HFOs, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%