Abstract:Population explosion, urbanization, changes in lifestyle management, improper food habits and various other factors play focal contributors in the massive prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the developing countries. Although insulin is the cornerstone in the management of type 1 diabetes; insulin, anti-hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic agents are proved to be effective in type 2 diabetes, although their efficacy decreases with the progress of the disease. Moreover a significant number of side effects, most… Show more
“…Despite lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus continue to experience increases in glucose levels over time, which is likely to be as a consequence of declining β-cell function. One study found that approximately two-thirds of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in developed countries do not effectively control their glucose levels and that an even greater proportion does not do so in developing countries, particularly in China ( 2 ). A major reason for this failure is the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus, which makes it difficult for patients to maintain target levels of glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c; HbA1c) using traditional glucose-lowering agents, and usually requires them to take multiple antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) to attain or maintain glycemic control.…”
Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results for the efficacy of sitagliptin and sulfonylurea therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus showing inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy. To clarify these findings, a meta-analysis was conducted of the outcomes of all published RCTs comparing sitagliptin with sulfonylureas in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Standard medical databases were searched to identify relevant English- and Chinese-language RCTs. RCT results were compared regarding the mean change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level; the proportion achieving <7% HbAlc; and a change in body weight. No significant differences were found between the metformin plus sitagliptin and metformin plus sulfonylurea groups regarding HbAlc or the proportion achieving <7% HbAlc, while the metformin plus sitagliptin group experienced fewer hypoglycemic events (P<0.00001) and a greater reduction in body weight (P<0.00001). Metformin plus sitagliptin therapy may decrease HbAlc values in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not achieving their glycemic targets with metformin monotherapy in a manner similar to metformin plus sulfonylurea therapy, whilst posing a lower risk of hypoglycemia, and yielding a more beneficial effect on body weight.
“…Despite lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus continue to experience increases in glucose levels over time, which is likely to be as a consequence of declining β-cell function. One study found that approximately two-thirds of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in developed countries do not effectively control their glucose levels and that an even greater proportion does not do so in developing countries, particularly in China ( 2 ). A major reason for this failure is the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus, which makes it difficult for patients to maintain target levels of glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c; HbA1c) using traditional glucose-lowering agents, and usually requires them to take multiple antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) to attain or maintain glycemic control.…”
Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results for the efficacy of sitagliptin and sulfonylurea therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus showing inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy. To clarify these findings, a meta-analysis was conducted of the outcomes of all published RCTs comparing sitagliptin with sulfonylureas in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Standard medical databases were searched to identify relevant English- and Chinese-language RCTs. RCT results were compared regarding the mean change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level; the proportion achieving <7% HbAlc; and a change in body weight. No significant differences were found between the metformin plus sitagliptin and metformin plus sulfonylurea groups regarding HbAlc or the proportion achieving <7% HbAlc, while the metformin plus sitagliptin group experienced fewer hypoglycemic events (P<0.00001) and a greater reduction in body weight (P<0.00001). Metformin plus sitagliptin therapy may decrease HbAlc values in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not achieving their glycemic targets with metformin monotherapy in a manner similar to metformin plus sulfonylurea therapy, whilst posing a lower risk of hypoglycemia, and yielding a more beneficial effect on body weight.
“…GLP-1 and PYY) play an important role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis [5,7,20,21]. Elucidating the mechanisms responsible for improvement in plasma glucose concentration after bariatric/metabolic surgery will help identify potential targets for diabetes therapy [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, improving β‐cell function in people with type 2 diabetes improves glucose control; thus, therapies that improve β‐cell function (e.g. GLP‐1 receptor agonists and thiazolidinediones) produce durable reductions in HbA 1c in type 2 diabetes . Several studies have demonstrated marked improvement in β‐cell function in type 2 diabetes following gastric bypass , but no study has assessed the impact of ileal transposition and transit bipartition on β‐cell function in people with type 2 diabetes.…”
Aim
To compare the impact of four surgical procedures (mini‐gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, ileal transposition and transit bipartition) vs medical management on gut peptide secretion, β‐cell function and resolution of hyperglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes.
Research design and methods
A mixed‐meal tolerance test was administered 6–24 months after each surgical procedure (mini‐gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, ileal transposition and transit bipartition; n=30 in each group) and the results were compared with those obtained in matched lean (n=30) and obese (n=30) people with type 2 diabetes undergoing medical management.
Results
Participants in the mini‐gastric bypass and ileal transposition groups had a greater increase in plasma glucose concentration after the mixed‐meal tolerance test than those in the sleeve gastrectomy and transit bipartition groups. Participants in the mini‐gastric bypass group exhibited the greatest increase in the incremental area under the curve of plasma glucose concentration above baseline (P<0.0001). Insulin sensitivity was similar across surgical groups, and statistically greater in participants in the surgical groups than in obese participants in the non‐surgical group (P<0.0001). β‐cell responsiveness to glucose was greater in participants in the sleeve gastrectomy and transit bipartition groups than in the mini‐gastric bypass and ileal transposition groups (P<0.001) despite a smaller incremental increase above baseline in the area under the plasma glucagon‐like peptide‐1 concentration curve relative to ileal transposition. Postoperative β‐cell function was the strongest predictor of hyperglycaemia resolution.
Conclusions
The present study showed that the level of β‐cell function after bariatric surgery is the strongest predictor of hyperglycaemia resolution. The study also demonstrates a disconnect between postprandial GLP‐1 levels and β‐cell function among the studied surgical procedures.
“…3 A Study showed that control of T2DM is not up to the mark in the developed countries in about 2/3 rd of patients and this fact is even more pronounced in the developing countries. 4 In Pakistan, the prevalence T2DM is quite high and approximately 6.3 million people have this disease. This is likely to increase and by 2030 about 11.4 million peoples will have diabetes if appropriate measures are not taken.…”
Background: Diabetic complications are related to impaired glycemic control. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that metformin therapy in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could reduce HbA1c and complications. So, metformin has been suggested to be the drug of choice after life style modifications in patients with T2DM. Repaglinide, short-acting insulin secretagogues, has excellent anti-hyperglycemic effect and a lower risk of hypoglycemia. However, whether repaglinide can be used as an initial therapy in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM is still unconfirmed. Objectives: The objective of this study was: To compare efficacy of Repaglinide and Metformin in the Treatment of New Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: District headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: 6 Months (Jan 2018 to June 2018). Methodology: Patients were randomly divided into two groups (A & B) by using computer generated random number table. Group A was given repaglinide 0.75-1.5 mg/day while group B received metformin 750-1500mg/day. The doses of metformin and repaglinide were adjusted according to blood glucose level. For HbA1C and FBS, blood samples were sent to pathology laboratory at the start of study and after 3 months. Follow up was ensured by reaching the patients through telephonic contact. Data was collected through self-conducted interviews using a standardized Performa. Results: In our study, mean+sd was calculated as 44.54+5.92 years in Group-A and 45.31+6.13 years in Group-B, 42.86%(n=15) in Group-A and 40%(n=14) in Group-B were male whereas 57.14%(n=20) in Group-A and 60%(n=21) in Group-B were females. Baseline mean HbA1c levels of the patients were calculated as 7.51+0.50 mmol/L in Group-A and 7.54+0.52 mmol/L in Group B, p value was 0.81. After treatment, these findings were reduced to 5.57+0.65 in Group-A and 6.4+0.49 in Group-B, p value was 0.0001, At baseline mean fasting blood glucose levels of the patients were calculated as 7.43+0.56 mmol/L in Group-A and 7.46+0.50 mmol/L in Group B, p value was 0.82. After treatment, these findings were reduced to 5.83+0.71 in Group-A and 6.29+0.67 in Group-B, p value was 0.007. Conclusion: We concluded that on comparison of Metformin and Repaglinide monotherapy in the Treatment of New Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in terms of mean fasting blood glucose and mean HbA1c, both drugs reduced HbA1c and fasting blood sugar but Repaglinide was found significantly better for reduction of HbA1c and fasting blood sugar when compared to Metformin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.