1979
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90105-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview No. 3 Fracture-mechanism maps and their construction for f.c.c. metals and alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
109
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the assumption that the chemical potential is determined at all times by the applied stress must be dropped in favor of a stress that increases as the internal, loadbearing area decreases. Harris et al [13] make this adjustment as well as that suggested by Speight and Harris [11] earlier, and find that the Hull and Rimmer model predicts 2 2 In deriving the equation which ultimately leads to their form of eq (7). Speight and Harris [11] assumed that the stress midway between cavities is given by the remote stress, or by an adjusted ligament stress [13].…”
Section: Modeling Of Creep Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then the assumption that the chemical potential is determined at all times by the applied stress must be dropped in favor of a stress that increases as the internal, loadbearing area decreases. Harris et al [13] make this adjustment as well as that suggested by Speight and Harris [11] earlier, and find that the Hull and Rimmer model predicts 2 2 In deriving the equation which ultimately leads to their form of eq (7). Speight and Harris [11] assumed that the stress midway between cavities is given by the remote stress, or by an adjusted ligament stress [13].…”
Section: Modeling Of Creep Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, their final result was (6) where p(=f3 2 /f) is the number of cavity nuclei per unit area of grain boundary and f3 is a geometric factor related to the coordination number of nearestneighbor cavities (for example, f3 = 1 for a square array and f3=(4/3)1/4 for an hexagonal array). Although the time-to-fracture and its stress dependence are the important parameters from an engineering perspective, the intermediate result of cavity size as a function of time, and also of cavity size distributions, are the important quantities when making a nondestructive assessment of creep damage for remaining lifetime.…”
Section: Modeling Of Creep Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the difference reduces at elevated temperatures. 25) The schematic illustration of the variation of workability with temperature for AM60 is shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Rolled Am60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be visualized in stress versus temperature maps. Ashby et al 7 proposed an experimental map, while Miller and Langdon 8 proposed a model-based map for fracture. Both maps 7,8 are limited in the validity to interpret creep fracture because of simplified hypothesis in their construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%