2012
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e31825297ba
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview and Recommendations for Medical Screening and Diagnostic Evaluation for Postdeployment Lung Disease in Returning US Warfighters

Abstract: There is a need for targeted, practical medical surveillance for lung diseases and for a standardized diagnostic approach for all symptomatic deployed personnel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Denver Working Group on Post-Deployment Health paper in an issue of the JOEM provides expert recommendations to promote surveillance pre- and post-deployment in regions of conflict, such as Iraq and Afghanistan [15]. The recommendations take into account risks of new-onset asthma and bronchiolitis.…”
Section: Future Research Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Denver Working Group on Post-Deployment Health paper in an issue of the JOEM provides expert recommendations to promote surveillance pre- and post-deployment in regions of conflict, such as Iraq and Afghanistan [15]. The recommendations take into account risks of new-onset asthma and bronchiolitis.…”
Section: Future Research Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key conclusion of the Denver Working Group is that there is a need for targeted, practical medical surveillance for lung diseases and for a standardized diagnostic approach for all symptomatic deployed personnel [15] (Tables 1-3). …”
Section: Future Research Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger population-based samples of veterans are therefore necessary to confirm our findings; however, our data do support prior recommendations to perform bronchodilator spirometry in deployed veterans regardless of prebronchodilator performance. 10 It should also be noted that standard clinical criteria for bronchodilator responsiveness were utilized in the present study, 21 yet other studies have used different and perhaps more liberal criteria including post-bronchodilator increases in peak expiratory flow (PEF) at least 15% and mid-expiratory flow (FEF ) at least 35%. 26 Had these alternative criteria been employed in the present study, approximately 42% would have demonstrated a positive bronchodilator response despite having normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry, as compared with 17% using FEV 1 and FVC criteria alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[3][4][5] Although military personnel may be uniquely vulnerable and susceptible to airborne hazards, 6 a causal relationship between deploymentrelated exposures and respiratory disease has not been established in recent combat veterans. Despite several reviews, 3,6-8 recommendations, 3,9,10 and the launch of a national registry database, 11 few studies are available that document objective pulmonary function among veterans who had deployed to Southwest Asia. [12][13][14] At present, the literature is composed predominantly of retrospective studies and surveys, which have recently been reviewed elsewhere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The convened group included civilian and military experts in airborne hazards and respiratory diseases, and examined the limited available evidence to develop a general consensus for further investigations. Some general recommendations included conducting standardized pre-and postdeployment medical surveillance; establishing criteria for medical referral and diagnosis; and developing case definitions for key deployment-related lung diseases [Rose et al 2012]. It was clear that a coordinated effort to resolve issues related to deployment-related respiratory disease would be required because available data were limited.…”
Section: Development Of a Pulmonary Health Research Programmentioning
confidence: 99%