2014
DOI: 10.1785/0120140100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overtone Interference in Array-Based Love-Wave Phase Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that the σ value for Love waves is systematically greater than for Rayleigh waves and decreases with increasing period (Figure ). A higher σ value for Love compared to Rayleigh waves is due, in part, to the larger relative observational errors of the spatial autocorrelation measurements at shorter paths [e.g., Ekström , ], and possibly also the potential contamination of overtones on Love waves compared to Rayleigh waves [e.g., Foster et al ., ]. It could also be due to the modeling errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that the σ value for Love waves is systematically greater than for Rayleigh waves and decreases with increasing period (Figure ). A higher σ value for Love compared to Rayleigh waves is due, in part, to the larger relative observational errors of the spatial autocorrelation measurements at shorter paths [e.g., Ekström , ], and possibly also the potential contamination of overtones on Love waves compared to Rayleigh waves [e.g., Foster et al ., ]. It could also be due to the modeling errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a longer period range of 30-100 s, we analyzed teleseismic fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves by assuming propagation of a plane wave in a local coordinate defined by Forsyth and Li (2005). Although we analyzed Love waves, we will not describe the detail because the significant interference between higherand fundamental-mode Love waves cannot be resolved with our dataset of small array size (e.g., Foster et al, 2014;Gaherty et al, 1996).…”
Section: Broadband Dispersion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of high-quality seismograms involves visually checking the waveforms based on the criteria proposed by Li and Li [2015]. We discard bad data that show incoherent waveforms at nearby stations due to the strong interference from higher modes [Nettles and Dziewonski, 2011;Foster et al, 2014] and multiple surfacereflected SH waves. We also exclude events that produce less than 7 highquality seismograms.…”
Section: Love Wave Dispersion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%