Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges

Abstract

BackgroundSurgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon-innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process.MethodsA literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted.ResultsOversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non-standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon-innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation.DiscussionWe summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice.

European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities

“…International guidelines, such as the IDEAL framework, provide a structured approach for implementation and evaluation of new surgical innovations [ 81 , 82 ]. Despite the widespread availability of such guidelines, they have been poorly adopted, reinforcing the guideline impacting knowledge-to-practice gap that impedes practice change [ 83 , 84 ]. Therefore, the incorporation of new technology into emergency surgical care has largely occurred in an unstructured fashion.…”

Robot-assisted general surgery in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…59 At Te Whatu Ora -Waitematā District we have established a transdisciplinary committee of multi-speciality clinicians, hospital management and non-clinical representation that guides the implementation of RAS in line with suggested evidence-based practice. 60 We have also developed an independent credentialing process that recognises individual surgeon performance is context specific and is not necessarily portable from one setting to another. 61…”

30 Years of pediatric endoscopic surgery and the challenge goes on

“…The old days of "cowboys and desperado's" are over. Today we have to go through protocols, subscribed by medical societies or governments [12]. This makes setting up innovative projects more difficult.…”

“…This makes setting up innovative projects more difficult. Gupta et al [12] have set up a framework for the determination of an appropriate level of oversight. Furthermore, there is an increasing demand for concentration of care in centers of expertise.…”