Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility

Abstract

As individuals and political leaders increasingly interact in online social networks, it is important to understand the dynamics of emotion perception online. Here, we propose that social media users overperceive levels of moral outrage felt by individuals and groups, inflating beliefs about intergroup hostility. Utilizing a Twitter field survey, we measured authors' moral outrage in real time and compared authors' reports to observers' judgments of the authors' moral outrage. We find that observers systematically overperceive moral outrage in authors, inferring more intense moral outrage experiences from messages than the authors of those messages actually reported. This effect was stronger in participants who spent more time on social media to learn about politics. Pre-registered confirmatory behavioral experiments found that overperception of individuals' moral outrage causes overperception of collective moral outrage and inflates beliefs about hostile communication norms, group affective polarization and ideological extremity. Together, these results highlight how individual-level overperceptions of online moral outrage produce collective overperceptions that have the potential to warp our social knowledge of moral and political attitudes.

Vaccine Nationalism Counterintuitively Erodes Public Trust in Leaders

“…Thus, this disconnect reflects a form of pluralistic ignorance (Miller & McFarland, 1991), wherein individuals systematically misperceive public opinion by overestimating how much it differs from their own. Indeed, such misperceptions of public opinions have been shown in other domains such as climate change (Leviston et al, 2013;Sparkman et al, 2022), alcohol consumption (Prentice & Miller, 1993), and political hostility (Brady et al, 2023;Moore-Berg et al, 2020;Ruggeri et al, 2021). Collectively, these results demonstrate that endorsement of redistributive vaccine policies enhances public trust in leaders and suggest that an accurate understanding of public opinion by policymakers is crucial for the containment and prevention of current and future health crises and resource shortages.…”

What Makes Groups Emotional?

“…Things are more complicated, however, when it comes to human interactions because unlike ants or neurons, people's dynamics are also impacted by how people perceive, represent and understand these dynamics (Galesic et al, 2021;Vlasceanu et al, 2018). People's perception of the collective emotion is often inaccurate (Brady et al, 2023;Lau et al, 2016), which may impact both how people react themselves to emotional situations and the social ties that they may choose to interact with. Therefore, understanding human collective behavior requires adding an important component in the model: people's cognition of the collective system.…”

“…Recent research suggests that when exposed to the emotions of others, people tend to perceive these emotions as stronger than they actually are and to further evaluate collective emotions as more emotional (Brady et al, 2023). This recent work points to amplification as a result of the evaluation of a single emotional expression, but amplification may be even more extreme given people often see multiple emotional expressions in response to any situation.…”

Americans misperceive the frequency and format of political debate

“…This negativity is exacerbated by non-human actors or “bots” that often inflame online conflicts 23 . When people do perceive information on social media, they also tend to view it more negatively as a result of being observed on the platform 24 . These factors combined suggest that negative, conflict-laden debates will flow to the top of people’s timelines.…”