1996
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.56181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overnight Rate Innovations as a Measure of Monetary Policy Shocks in Vector Autoregressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a few papers for Canada on identifying the effects of monetary policy with VARs. Armour et al (1996) use a standard VAR with the recursive assumptionà la Christiano et al (1996Christiano et al ( , 1999 and find small effects on output and prices (peak of -0.1 per cent).…”
Section: C5 Comparison With Wider Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few papers for Canada on identifying the effects of monetary policy with VARs. Armour et al (1996) use a standard VAR with the recursive assumptionà la Christiano et al (1996Christiano et al ( , 1999 and find small effects on output and prices (peak of -0.1 per cent).…”
Section: C5 Comparison With Wider Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Armour et al (1996) find that innovations in the overnight rate, derived using a Choleski decomposition, were consistent with intended policy actions as described in the Bank of Canada's Annual Reports since the early 1960s.…”
Section: Data and Preliminary Specificationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…3 Data for the estimations were retrieved from the OECD database for "Main Economic Indicators" (2010) at https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00052-en and available on Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). 4 Armour et al (1996) find that innovations in the overnight rate, derived using a Choleski decomposition, were consistent with intended policy actions as described in the Bank of Canada's Annual Reports since the early-1960s. 5 Hodrick and Prescott motivated their choice of = 1600 based on the prior belief that a large change in the cyclical component within a quarter would be around 5 per cent, whereas a large change in the trend component would be around (1/8) per cent, suggesting a choice of = ⁄ = ( ) ( ) ⁄ = , where is the variance of the cyclical component and is the variance of the trend component.…”
Section: Data and Preliminary Specificationmentioning
confidence: 56%