Performance and QoS of Next Generation Networking 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0705-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overload Control Mechanisms for Web Servers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A common way to achieve efficient overload control in traditional distributed systems is to use admission control mechanisms [7,20]. In grids, however, instead of dropping or rejecting tasks, it may be sufficient to delay the submission of some of the tasks, in the expectation that the sites which to dispatch them will become less overloaded at a later time.…”
Section: Task Throttlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common way to achieve efficient overload control in traditional distributed systems is to use admission control mechanisms [7,20]. In grids, however, instead of dropping or rejecting tasks, it may be sufficient to delay the submission of some of the tasks, in the expectation that the sites which to dispatch them will become less overloaded at a later time.…”
Section: Task Throttlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of these rate limits, however, is not dynamic but is delegated to the administrator. Iyer et al [Iyer et al 2000] propose a system based on two mechanisms-using thresholds on the connection queue length to decide when to start dropping new connection requests and sending feedback to the proxy during overloads which would cause it to restrict the traffic being forwarded to the server. However, they do not address how these thresholds may be determined online.…”
Section: Slas and Adaptive Qos Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing any meaningful usage/cost gains for the power infrastructure may require setting the provisioning parameters (e.g., p and δ introduced in the previous section) high enough to make the likelihood of budget violations non-negligible. Furthermore, hard-to-predict workload changes (such as an overload experienced by an e-commerce site [Iyer 2000]) may also render budget violations more likely than predicted using application profiles. These concerns necessitate mechanisms within a data center that can completely avert such episodes.…”
Section: Enforcement Of Soft Fusesmentioning
confidence: 99%