2010 17th International Conference on Telecommunications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ictel.2010.5478787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overload control in SIP servers: Evaluation and improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topology used to implement and simulate the proposed method is shown in Figure . The topology is known as a standard in the IP multimedia subsystems (IMS) architecture used by SIP service providers. The topology consists of two different domains, each of which can be related to a specific geographic area.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The topology used to implement and simulate the proposed method is shown in Figure . The topology is known as a standard in the IP multimedia subsystems (IMS) architecture used by SIP service providers. The topology consists of two different domains, each of which can be related to a specific geographic area.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Shen, 3 window‐based methods are proposed whose responding capacity is estimated by the overloaded server; then, a window size is reported to upstream servers. In Homayouni et al and Azhari et al, based on call setup delay and similar to a slow start phase in TCP, the window size is determined implicitly. In Abdelal and Matragi, an implicit method is proposed by using a leaky bucket mechanism to send invite requests to a downstream server.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other pushback solutions can be found. 5,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Such pushback control solutions aim at preventing the overload of a server by reducing the sending rate of its upstream servers. This would increase the queuing delays of newly arrived original messages at the upstream servers, which in turn cause overload at the upstream servers.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Sip Overload Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%