2013
DOI: 10.1021/la4040547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overlimiting Current and Shock Electrodialysis in Porous Media

Abstract: Most electrochemical processes, such as electrodialysis, are limited by diffusion, but in porous media, surface conduction and electroosmotic flow also contribute to ionic flux. In this article, we report experimental evidence for surface-driven overlimiting current (faster than diffusion) and deionization shocks (propagating salt removal) in a porous medium. The apparatus consists of a silica glass frit (1 mm thick with a 500 nm mean pore size) in an aqueous electrolyte (CuSO4 or AgNO3) passing ionic current … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
253
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
11
253
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous studies have established the simple power-law scaling of OLC with salt concentration and surface charge in a fixed geometry [35,36], our data reveal a nonmonotonic dependence on the microchannel depth with a minimum conductance at a depth of roughly 8 μm. From previous theory [31,35], the OLC due to SC is proportional to the volume-area ratio, or inverse of depth, d −1 , in nanochannels and thus the OLC decreases with increasing depth. In contrast, the OLC due to electroosmotic surface convection in microchannels is predicted to have the opposite trend, scaling as d 4=5 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While previous studies have established the simple power-law scaling of OLC with salt concentration and surface charge in a fixed geometry [35,36], our data reveal a nonmonotonic dependence on the microchannel depth with a minimum conductance at a depth of roughly 8 μm. From previous theory [31,35], the OLC due to SC is proportional to the volume-area ratio, or inverse of depth, d −1 , in nanochannels and thus the OLC decreases with increasing depth. In contrast, the OLC due to electroosmotic surface convection in microchannels is predicted to have the opposite trend, scaling as d 4=5 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…This new mode of surface convection thus cannot be described by classical Taylor-Aris dispersion [33,34]. The EOF mechanism, extended for "eddy fingers" in a random porous medium, has been confirmed indirectly by experiments measuring the current-voltage relation, scaling with salt concentration or surface charge, and desalination efficiency of "shock electrodialysis" [35]. The SC mechanism has also been confirmed in straight nanopores with controlled surface charge by again predicting the current-voltage relation and by ex situ imaging of metal electrodeposits grown along the pore walls by SC [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that interfaces between charged membranes or nanochannels and unsupported bulk electrolytes lead to ion concentration polarization outside the membrane, e.g., in classical electrodialysis [33][34][35], but complex nonequilibrium electrokinetic phenomena resulting from strong concentration polarization have recently been discovered inside membrane pores or microchannels, such as deionization shock waves [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41] and overlimiting current sustained by surface conduction (electromigration) and electro-osmotic flow [42][43][44][45] with applications to nanotemplated electrodeposition [46] and water desalination by "shock electrodialysis" [47]. In most situations for nanochannels, the ions remain in local quasiequilibrium, since electromigration FIG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the concentration "shock waves" that occur in current-polarized sub-micro-channels in contact with nano-channels have been predicted for the first time by ) and further explored in (Mani and Bazant 2011;Dydek et al 2011;Yaroshchuk 2012;Deng et al 2013). In another publication (Zangle et al 2010), the authors considered the implications of depletion and enrichment "shocks" for the analyte pre-concentration via stacking and/or focusing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%