Overhead effects of data encryption on TCP throughput across IPSEC secured network

Abolade, Olatilewa; Okandeji, Alexander A.; Oke, Alice; Osifeko, Martins O.; Oyedeji, Ajibola

doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00855

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When Tables 2 and 4 were compared, it was possible to deduce that with a long decryption time, the associated throughput time was short. This supports the findings of Abolade et al [ 54 ], who discovered that algorithms with a high throughput time need less CPU time.…”

Section: 0 Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ensuring privacy and confidentiality of cloud data: A comparative analysis of diverse cryptographic solutions based on run time trend

Dawson,

Frimpong,

Hayfron Acquah

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cloud is becoming a hub for sensitive data as technology develops, making it increasingly vulnerable, especially as more people get access. Data should be protected and secured since a larger number of individuals utilize the cloud for a variety of purposes. Confidentiality and privacy of data is attained through the use of cryptographic techniques. While each cryptographic method completes the same objective, they all employ different amounts of CPU, memory, throughput, encryption, and decryption times. It is necessary to contrast the various possibilities in order to choose the optimal cryptographic algorithm. An integrated data size of 5n*102 (KB (∈ 1,2,4,10,20,40) is evaluated in this article. Performance metrics including run time, memory use, and throughput time were used in the comparison. To determine the effectiveness of each cryptographic technique, the data sizes were run fifteen (15) times, and the mean simulation results were then reported. In terms of run time trend, NCS is superior to the other algorithms according to Friedman’s test and Bonferroni’s Post Hoc test.

show abstract

Section: 0 Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…According to Tables 1 and 3 , encryption time is inversely related to throughput time. Algorithms with faster throughput times use less CPU, and vice versa [ 54 ].…”

Section: 0 Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensuring privacy and confidentiality of cloud data: A comparative analysis of diverse cryptographic solutions based on run time trend

Dawson,

Frimpong,

Hayfron Acquah

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the network layer, there is authentication of exchange participants, encryption and tunneling of traffic transmitted between nodes, for example, using the IPSec protocol stack [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software implementation of the data encryption module on the BeagleBone platform for data transmission systems with increased cryptoresistance

Seniv,

Rovenchak,

Yakovyna

2023

HAIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In today's digital world, where the exchange of information is an integral part of our daily lives, ensuring information security becomes a criticaltask. This work aimsto develop an information protection module for data encryption on the BeagleBone platform for data transmission systems with increased crypto resistance. Itis a hardware system based on a BeagleBone AI 64 microcomputer with antennas for transmitting/receiving data. Since the information is transmitted over a physically unprotected channel, developing a module that will encrypt the data is necessary. The information protection module ensures the confidentiality of the transmitted data in the system using the AES symmetric encryption algorithm with a variable key length (128/192/256 bits). Regardless of the hardware platform, it is characterized by universality, as it can be run on the Linux kernel adapted for use on embedded systems. Providesoptions for configuring protocols and encryption algorithms. In the process of developing the security module, modern encryption methods and algorithms were used (AES 128/192/256 –for data encryption, RSA –for the distribution of secret keys), in addition, a lightweight protocol for secure data transmission Scplight was implemented as an alternative to OpenSSL, which improves transfer speed on low-power hardware platforms. The developed information protection module has undergone thorough testing on a real system. Thedevelopment of the information protection module is based on the need for a universal component that provides high-quality data protection in wireless communication systems. This module will accelerate the development of relatively affordable physical means of secure communication, a critical partofsuch projects. The module is implemented as a library written in the C language, which implements an API for establishing a secure connection and further forwarding information over an unprotected transmissionchannel. In addition, a configurator programallows you to change the module settings even in real-time when client applications use it. This ensures continuous, seamless, and secure data exchangeandconvenient configuration of the module. Many supporting libraries were used in the development process, including Crypton, Libgcrypt, Openssl, Ncurses and Sqlite3.

show abstract

Performance assessment of the impact of the encryption layer on a highly available campus network

Morsli,

Boulhilate,

Ibourk

et al. 2024

Procedia Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Overhead effects of data encryption on TCP throughput across IPSEC secured network

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Ensuring privacy and confidentiality of cloud data: A comparative analysis of diverse cryptographic solutions based on run time trend

Ensuring privacy and confidentiality of cloud data: A comparative analysis of diverse cryptographic solutions based on run time trend

Software implementation of the data encryption module on the BeagleBone platform for data transmission systems with increased cryptoresistance

Performance assessment of the impact of the encryption layer on a highly available campus network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About