The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.18462/iir.gl.2016.1039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overfed evaporators and parallel compression in commercial R744 booster refrigeration systems - An assessment of energy benefits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Some of the most common energy saving topologies proposed in these systems include the employment of parallel (auxiliary) compressor, the integration of mechanical subcooling, the overfed evaporators concept, as well as the exploitation of ejector arrangement. [7][8][9][10] The aforementioned configurations have been investigated both in theoretical and experimental manner, confirming significant energy saving figures in the consumption of CO 2 refrigeration systems. 11 However, the adoption and implementation of such state-ofthe-art configurations dramatically increase the capital cost of refrigeration systems they are integrated into.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…6 Some of the most common energy saving topologies proposed in these systems include the employment of parallel (auxiliary) compressor, the integration of mechanical subcooling, the overfed evaporators concept, as well as the exploitation of ejector arrangement. [7][8][9][10] The aforementioned configurations have been investigated both in theoretical and experimental manner, confirming significant energy saving figures in the consumption of CO 2 refrigeration systems. 11 However, the adoption and implementation of such state-ofthe-art configurations dramatically increase the capital cost of refrigeration systems they are integrated into.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%