2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01265.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overestimation of Fire Risk in the Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan

Abstract: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's recent recovery plan for one of the most carefully watched threatened species worldwide, the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), recommended a major departure in conservation strategies in the northwestern United States. Due to concern about fire, the plan would switch from a reserve to a no-reserve strategy in up to 52% of the owl's range. Fuel treatments (e.g., thinning) at regular intervals also would occur on up to 65-70% of dry forests in this area. Esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The fraction of total fire burning at high severity in dry forests of the eastern Cascades also did not increase from 1984-2005(Hanson et al 2009. If the goal is maintaining or restoring historical fire regimes, treating large land areas (e.g., about 45% of dry forests in 20 years; Johnson and Franklin 2009) to reduce highseverity fire would, if effective, substantially add to fire exclusion and alter or degrade, not restore these forests.…”
Section: Fuel Reduction Is Not Ecological Restoration In Dry Forestsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). The fraction of total fire burning at high severity in dry forests of the eastern Cascades also did not increase from 1984-2005(Hanson et al 2009. If the goal is maintaining or restoring historical fire regimes, treating large land areas (e.g., about 45% of dry forests in 20 years; Johnson and Franklin 2009) to reduce highseverity fire would, if effective, substantially add to fire exclusion and alter or degrade, not restore these forests.…”
Section: Fuel Reduction Is Not Ecological Restoration In Dry Forestsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4). Also, the risk of high-severity fire has not increased relative to historical landscapes, as the 435-year approximation of historical high-severity fire rotation is little different from the 469-year recent high-severity rotation in old forests in the eastern Oregon Cascades (Hanson et al 2009). The fraction of total fire burning at high severity also has not increased.…”
Section: Fuel Reduction Is Not Ecological Restoration In Dry Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The belief that recent fires, such as the 196,000-ha Biscuit Fire in 2002, were more severe than the historical norm could be used to justify managing fire hazard through thinning or prescribed fire in currently dense stands (12,13). However, some have questioned whether increased fuels from fire suppression indeed pose an increased risk of severe fire (14,15) and whether climate may override fuel as a control of fire occurrence and extent (10,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Hanson et al (2009), we analyzed only late-successional, or "older" forests present in 1995, as mapped by Moeur et al (2005). This is a small fraction of the dry forest regions.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%