2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overestimation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by increased ionisation efficiency of 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in LC–MS/MS methods not separating both metabolites as determined by an LC–MS/MS method for separate quantification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 in human serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its clinical significance is unknown but it could be erroneously measured as 25OHD even with liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry [19,20]. Nevertheless, in a recent study on the time-course analysis of 3-epi-25-hydoxyvitamin D3 in infants, 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level normalized to <10% in infants older than 3 months of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its clinical significance is unknown but it could be erroneously measured as 25OHD even with liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry [19,20]. Nevertheless, in a recent study on the time-course analysis of 3-epi-25-hydoxyvitamin D3 in infants, 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level normalized to <10% in infants older than 3 months of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 37 single patient donor serum samples were obtained by drawing an extra tube of blood from patients who already underwent a venipuncture for diagnostic purposes in our outpatient clinic (VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam). These patient sera had concentrations ranging from <1 to 134 nmol/L for 25(OH)D 3 , < 2 to 27 nmol/L for 25(OH)D 2 and < 1 to 7 nmol/L for epi25(OH)D 3 as determined by [12]. All samples were anonymized immediately after withdrawal and processed like regular patient samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure S1 (Supplementary Material) illustrates the separation of 25(OH)D 3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D 3 for a CLD patient sample, showing~5% contribution of the epimer relative to the 25(OH)D 3 signal. Note that the peak areas of the two epimers are not directly comparable because of significant response factor differences between the two epimer species, as recently described by van den Ouweland et al [25] and Flynn et al [26], requiring a dedicated stable isotope standard for 3-epi-25(OH)D 3 [12].…”
Section: Hrms: Tof-ms Versus Tof-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the instrumental resolving power of the QqTOF initially appeared to be sufficiently high, there was a small overlap of the main interference at m/z 401.2666 (C 21 H 33 N 6 O 2 + ; mass measurement accuracy, 1.5 ppm; the same interference was previously observed in the isobaric space of m/z 401 by FTICR analysis of serum samples [6]) from the tail-end of the peak into the 25(OH)D 3 signal. This effect caused isobaric cross-talk from the slightly skewed peaks, which then irreproducibly co-contributed to signal intensities of 25 + ion at m/z 401.3414 and no interference occurred [18]. This separation is particulary important for those targeted assays that include vitamin D 2 species in the acquisition routine.…”
Section: Hrms: Tof-ms Versus Tof-ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%