2014
DOI: 10.1038/mto.2014.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming tumor resistance by heterologous adeno-poxvirus combination therapy

Abstract: Successful cancer control relies on overcoming resistance to cell death and on activation of host antitumor immunity. Oncolytic viruses are particularly attractive in this regard, as they lyse infected tumor cells and trigger robust immune responses during the infection. However, repeated injections of the same virus promote antiviral rather than antitumor immunity and tumors may mount innate antiviral defenses to restrict oncolytic virus replication. In this article, we have explored if alternating the therap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herpes simplex viruses G207 and NV1020 and poxvirus based therapy have also required doses of 10 7 PFU to cause tumor regression [ 24 , 25 ]. Typically, in vivo cancer models in athymic mice have required a therapeutic dose of 10 6 –10 8 PFU for intravenous delivery [ 22 , 26 , 27 ] and at least 10 7 PFU for intratumoral delivery [ 28 30 ]. In our study, in vivo therapeutic efficacy was noted after a single dose of 10 3 PFU and the mice displayed no toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herpes simplex viruses G207 and NV1020 and poxvirus based therapy have also required doses of 10 7 PFU to cause tumor regression [ 24 , 25 ]. Typically, in vivo cancer models in athymic mice have required a therapeutic dose of 10 6 –10 8 PFU for intravenous delivery [ 22 , 26 , 27 ] and at least 10 7 PFU for intratumoral delivery [ 28 30 ]. In our study, in vivo therapeutic efficacy was noted after a single dose of 10 3 PFU and the mice displayed no toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficacy was dependent upon the sequence of the virus treatments, and, significantly, upon CD3+ T cells, indicating that the combination of viruses was acting through an immunological prime-boost-like mechanism 41 . The combination of adenovirus and vaccinia virus was also successful in slowing anti-viral, and innate cellular, immune responses leading to better anti-tumor therapy 42 . Similarly, a combination of Semliki Forest Virus and Vaccinia virus was effective at boosting anti-tumor immune responses in a murine ovarian cancer model and generated improved therapy through both oncolysis and enhanced anti-tumor immunity 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the therapeutic efficacy of HAd5, its tropism has been increased by switching its receptor-binding domain, the so-called fiber knob, to that of other human adenovirus serotypes, such as HAd3 and HAd11p, which utilize more ubiquitous and cancer-overexpressed receptors for infection, desmoglein-2 (DSG-2) and cluster of differentiation 46 (CD46), respectively [10] , [11] , [12] . However, the expression patterns of also these receptors in tumors may be heterogenic, and as we and others have shown, the replication of some oncolytic viruses is also regulated intracellularly, particularly by components of the interferon (IFN)-inducible antiviral defense [13] , [14] , [15] . To complicate matters, most analyses of virus tropism and oncolytic efficacy to date have been made in established cell lines, which are prone to significant transcriptional and phenotypic deviation from the parental tumors they were derived from [16] , [17] , [18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%