2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.c112.408864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Transcription Activator-like Effector (TALE) DNA Binding Domain Sensitivity to Cytosine Methylation

Abstract: Background: TALE-based technologies are poised to revolutionize the field of biotechnology; however, their sensitivity to cytosine methylation may drastically restrict their ranges of applications. Results: TALE repeat N* proficiently accommodates 5-methylated cytosine. Conclusion: Sensitivity of TALE to cytosine methylation can be overcome by using TALE repeat N*. Significance: Utilization of TALE repeat N* enables broadening the scope of TALE-based technologies.Within the past 2 years, transcription activato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
142
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of TALEs in particular can be advantageous when a particular target area lacks a PAM, since TALEs can be programmed to target any sequence. TALEs are able to distinguish between methylcytosine (mC) and cytosine (C), which may be advantageous or disadvantageous, depending on the situation (52,53,63). The methylation status of the targeted site must be taken into account when designing TALEs, which is not the case for Cas9 targeting.…”
Section: Crispra Versus Previous Activation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of TALEs in particular can be advantageous when a particular target area lacks a PAM, since TALEs can be programmed to target any sequence. TALEs are able to distinguish between methylcytosine (mC) and cytosine (C), which may be advantageous or disadvantageous, depending on the situation (52,53,63). The methylation status of the targeted site must be taken into account when designing TALEs, which is not the case for Cas9 targeting.…”
Section: Crispra Versus Previous Activation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported sensitivity of TALENs to 5-methylcytosine could be a more serious drawback of the TALEN technology because of the prevalence of this DNA modification in the genome (38,39). Recent evidence shows that this problem may be overcome by engineering 5-methylcytosineinsensitive TALE DNA-binding domains (39). The extent of off-target effect of TALENs is largely unknown.…”
Section: Genome Editing With Synthetic Nucleasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this should not prohibit successful design of TALENs in most cases, it may be an issue when modifying a specific mutation especially for future cell-based gene therapy. The reported sensitivity of TALENs to 5-methylcytosine could be a more serious drawback of the TALEN technology because of the prevalence of this DNA modification in the genome (38,39). Recent evidence shows that this problem may be overcome by engineering 5-methylcytosineinsensitive TALE DNA-binding domains (39).…”
Section: Genome Editing With Synthetic Nucleasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TALENs have been shown to have a high success rate in targeting a wide range of genes in a number of organisms; however, recent studies suggest that TALEN binding is sensitive to cytosine methylation 30,31 .Thus, newly generated nuclease pairs, for example TALENs cloned into pCAG-T7 vectors, can be transfected transiently into a mouse cell line such as NIH-3T3 or Neuro-2a, which mimic the chromatin state of the mouse embryo to some extent. Here, nuclease activity can be estimated using the T7 endonuclease assay or a restriction digest of PCR product as described in section 5 prior to mRNA synthesis and microinjection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%