2003
DOI: 10.1177/0022167803043003012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Tough Challenges: An Invitational Theory of Practice for Humanistic Psychology

Abstract: The challenge for humanistic psychologists is not so much the further development of theoretical constructs. The challenge is to develop theories of practice that move from abstract formulations to concrete models. “Invitational Education” is one humanistic theory of practice that was used to help transform 12 suffering inner-city schools. The story of how this was done follows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thematic analysis revealed that nearly 88% of introductory courses attempt to achieve at least four of the following five learning outcomes: (a) demonstration of knowledge of the history and major theoretical approaches in psychology (typically behavioral, biological, cognitive, positive/humanistic, psychodynamic), (b) application of the major theoretical approaches to everyday life and social issues, (c) demonstration of knowledge of the scientific method including research methods in psychology, (d) demonstration of critical thinking skills including the formulation of questions, weighing of available evidence, drawing logical conclusions, critically evaluating popular media reports of psychological research, and (e) realization of personal development including gaining awareness of feelings, identifying personal and professional values, increasing tolerance of others, and so on. Many of these stated course goals are quite consistent with the educational ideals espoused in classical humanism and much of modern humanistic psychology (see Bridges, 1973; Davidson, 1992; Garrison, 2001; Hanson & Heath, 2001; Marrou, 1956; Purkey & Aspy, 2003). On paper at least, these goals sound quite impressive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Thematic analysis revealed that nearly 88% of introductory courses attempt to achieve at least four of the following five learning outcomes: (a) demonstration of knowledge of the history and major theoretical approaches in psychology (typically behavioral, biological, cognitive, positive/humanistic, psychodynamic), (b) application of the major theoretical approaches to everyday life and social issues, (c) demonstration of knowledge of the scientific method including research methods in psychology, (d) demonstration of critical thinking skills including the formulation of questions, weighing of available evidence, drawing logical conclusions, critically evaluating popular media reports of psychological research, and (e) realization of personal development including gaining awareness of feelings, identifying personal and professional values, increasing tolerance of others, and so on. Many of these stated course goals are quite consistent with the educational ideals espoused in classical humanism and much of modern humanistic psychology (see Bridges, 1973; Davidson, 1992; Garrison, 2001; Hanson & Heath, 2001; Marrou, 1956; Purkey & Aspy, 2003). On paper at least, these goals sound quite impressive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…School transformation is regarded as an ongoing process within the IE framework (Purkey & Aspy 2003). IE as an example of a school's PD programme provides 'an overarching framework' for influencing all aspects of schooling: people, places, policies, programmes and processes (Berg, 2008:46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the other four elements (people, places, programmes and policies) intentionality is the key element that provides purpose, direction and meaning in the whole implementation process (Purkey and Aspy, 2003). …”
Section: Photo 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a view of education, he continued, "would imply that we would do away with teaching" (p. 277). Although many have provided criticisms and revisions to this view of education (e.g., Purkey & Aspy, 2003), Rogers's formulation of humanistic education has been, and remains, quite influential.…”
Section: Standard-centered Versus Student-centered Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%